PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIBR vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIBR vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 19.63% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 28.15% return. Over the past 10 years, CIBR has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 17.88%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.86% annualized return.


CIBR

1D
-0.16%
1M
12.50%
YTD
19.63%
6M
15.68%
1Y
17.38%
3Y*
24.30%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
17.88%

SPMO

1D
1.26%
1M
4.23%
YTD
28.15%
6M
28.70%
1Y
43.47%
3Y*
41.53%
5Y*
23.50%
10Y*
20.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIBR vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
19.63%13.06%18.21%39.71%-26.46%19.67%50.53%28.52%1.47%18.61%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
28.15%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between CIBR and SPMO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.62

The correlation between CIBR and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.65 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CIBR vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CIBR
SPMO

Technology

94.0%
54.8%

Industrials

3.5%
10.9%

Communication Services

2.6%
8.7%

Basic Materials

-

1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.0%

Energy

-

3.1%

Financial Services

-

5.7%

Healthcare

-

6.2%

Real Estate

-

0.9%

Utilities

-

2.5%

Technology

CIBR
94.0%
SPMO
54.8%

Industrials

CIBR
3.5%
SPMO
10.9%

Communication Services

CIBR
2.6%
SPMO
8.7%

Basic Materials

CIBR

-

SPMO
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

CIBR

-

SPMO
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

CIBR

-

SPMO
4.0%

Energy

CIBR

-

SPMO
3.1%

Financial Services

CIBR

-

SPMO
5.7%

Healthcare

CIBR

-

SPMO
6.2%

Real Estate

CIBR

-

SPMO
0.9%

Utilities

CIBR

-

SPMO
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIBR vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIBR vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIBRSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.41

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

3.44

-2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.86

13.01

-11.15

CIBR vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIBR Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIBR and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIBR vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIBRSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.89%

-30.95%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.99%

-12.70%

-9.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.99%

-20.13%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

-22.74%

-11.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.89%

-30.95%

-2.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.53%

-1.68%

-7.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.66%

-4.60%

-4.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.38%

3.35%

+6.03%

Volatility

CIBR vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a higher volatility of 12.35% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 10.29%. This indicates that CIBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIBRSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.35%

10.29%

+2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.72%

16.73%

+4.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.16%

19.48%

+5.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.04%

19.65%

+5.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.65%

20.48%

+3.17%

CIBR vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIBR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

CIBR vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than SPMO's 0.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.48%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.67%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


CIBR and SPMO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIBR has higher volatility (12.35%) compared to SPMO (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIBR dropped -33.89% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.86% vs 17.88% for CIBR. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 10.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.86% return vs 17.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.

SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.48% for CIBR.

CIBR is categorized as Cybersecurity, while SPMO is Momentum. CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CIBR and 0.13% for SPMO.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIBR and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer