CIBR vs. SCHD
CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CIBR returned 17.88%/yr vs 12.91%/yr for SCHD. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CIBR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
CIBR vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 19.63% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 20.66% return. Over the past 10 years, CIBR has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 17.88%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.91% annualized return.
CIBR
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 12.50%
- YTD
- 19.63%
- 6M
- 15.68%
- 1Y
- 17.38%
- 3Y*
- 24.30%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 17.88%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
CIBR vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 19.63% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 28.52% | 1.47% | 18.61% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.66% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIBR and SCHD is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CIBR and SCHD has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
CIBR vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CIBR
SCHD
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
CIBR
SCHD
Industrials
CIBR
SCHD
Communication Services
CIBR
SCHD
Basic Materials
CIBR
-
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
CIBR
-
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
CIBR
-
SCHD
Energy
CIBR
-
SCHD
Financial Services
CIBR
-
SCHD
Healthcare
CIBR
-
SCHD
Real Estate
CIBR
-
SCHD
-
Utilities
CIBR
-
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIBR vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
CIBR
SCHD
CIBR vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIBR | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.43 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 5.70 | -4.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.86 | 13.97 | -12.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIBR vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIBR | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -33.37% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.99% | -4.61% | -17.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.99% | -16.13% | -5.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | -16.85% | -17.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.89% | -33.37% | -0.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.53% | -0.03% | -9.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.66% | -3.31% | -5.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.38% | 1.89% | +7.49% |
Volatility
CIBR vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a higher volatility of 12.35% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.05%. This indicates that CIBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIBR | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.35% | 3.05% | +9.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.72% | 7.53% | +14.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.16% | 10.93% | +14.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.04% | 14.38% | +10.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.65% | 16.72% | +6.93% |
CIBR vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIBR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIBR vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than SCHD's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.22% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIBR and SCHD have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIBR has higher volatility (12.35%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIBR dropped -33.89% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 17.88% vs 12.91% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 17.88% return vs 12.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.48% for CIBR.
CIBR is categorized as Cybersecurity, while SCHD is Dividend. CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CIBR and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIBR and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer