CIBR vs. QTUM-USD
CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) is Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while QTUM-USD (Qtum) is a cryptocurrency. Over the past 5 years, CIBR returned 14.60%/yr vs -35.76%/yr for QTUM-USD. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CIBR vs. QTUM-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 28.87% return, which is significantly higher than QTUM-USD's -49.48% return.
CIBR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 7.72%
- 6M
- 26.20%
- YTD
- 28.87%
- 1Y
- 27.22%
- 3Y*
- 26.81%
- 5Y*
- 14.60%
- 10Y*
- 18.39%
QTUM-USD
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- -11.45%
- 6M
- -51.37%
- YTD
- -49.48%
- 1Y
- -70.53%
- 3Y*
- -37.70%
- 5Y*
- -35.76%
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR vs. QTUM-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 28.87% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 28.52% | 1.47% | 4.68% |
QTUM-USD Qtum | -49.48% | -55.51% | -19.33% | 103.93% | -79.08% | 293.16% | 38.57% | -24.72% | -96.59% | 425.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIBR and QTUM-USD is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIBR vs. QTUM-USD — Risk / Return Rank
CIBR
QTUM-USD
CIBR vs. QTUM-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Qtum (QTUM-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIBR | QTUM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 0.85 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | -0.90 | +2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | -1.25 | +4.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIBR vs. QTUM-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum QTUM-USD drawdown of -99.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and QTUM-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIBR | QTUM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -99.30% | +65.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.99% | -78.50% | +56.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.99% | -88.32% | +66.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | -96.26% | +62.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.57% | -99.29% | +96.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.64% | -93.32% | +84.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.47% | 48.31% | -38.84% |
Volatility
CIBR vs. QTUM-USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) is 7.35%, while Qtum (QTUM-USD) has a volatility of 11.71%. This indicates that CIBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIBR | QTUM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.35% | 11.71% | -4.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.17% | 48.73% | -26.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.55% | 65.95% | -40.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.21% | 76.55% | -51.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.59% | 98.94% | -75.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIBR and QTUM-USD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTUM-USD has higher volatility (11.71%) compared to CIBR (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIBR dropped -33.89% vs QTUM-USD's -99.30%.
CIBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIBR and QTUM-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer