PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTUM-USD vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QTUM-USD vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Qtum (QTUM-USD) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTUM-USD achieves a -50.22% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 22.82% return.


QTUM-USD

1D
-1.69%
1M
-24.63%
YTD
-50.22%
6M
-45.07%
1Y
-66.34%
3Y*
-34.38%
5Y*
-35.20%
10Y*

VGT

1D
0.30%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
22.82%
6M
20.81%
1Y
42.45%
3Y*
30.31%
5Y*
19.42%
10Y*
25.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTUM-USD vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QTUM-USD
Qtum
-50.22%-55.51%-19.33%103.93%-79.08%293.16%38.57%-24.72%-96.59%425.34%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
22.82%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%-0.63%

Correlation

The correlation between QTUM-USD and VGT is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTUM-USD vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTUM-USD
QTUM-USD Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
QTUM-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTUM-USD vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Qtum (QTUM-USD) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QTUM-USDVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.32

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.85

2.60

-3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.23

7.87

-9.10

QTUM-USD vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTUM-USD Sharpe Ratio is -0.83, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTUM-USD and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QTUM-USD vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTUM-USD drawdown since its inception was -99.30%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM-USD and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTUM-USDVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.30%

-54.63%

-44.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-78.50%

-16.40%

-62.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-88.32%

-27.23%

-61.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.26%

-35.07%

-61.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.30%

-8.08%

-91.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.29%

-7.95%

-85.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.11%

5.41%

+41.70%

Volatility

QTUM-USD vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

Qtum (QTUM-USD) has a higher volatility of 19.57% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 11.17%. This indicates that QTUM-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTUM-USDVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.57%

11.17%

+8.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.17%

18.51%

+31.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.77%

22.66%

+44.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.11%

25.55%

+51.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

99.20%

24.76%

+74.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTUM-USD and VGT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTUM-USD has higher volatility (19.57%) compared to VGT (11.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM-USD dropped -99.30% vs VGT's -54.63%.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTUM-USD and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer