CIBR vs. IDGT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) and IDGT (iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - CIBR tracks the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index while IDGT tracks the S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CIBR returned 18.49%/yr vs 14.38%/yr for IDGT. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIBR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for IDGT.

Performance

CIBR vs. IDGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 28.52% return, which is significantly lower than IDGT's 53.90% return. Over the past 10 years, CIBR has outperformed IDGT with an annualized return of 18.49%, while IDGT has yielded a comparatively lower 14.38% annualized return.

CIBR

• 1D: -2.81%
• 1M: 31.43%
• YTD: 28.52%
• 6M: 24.03%
• 1Y: 25.78%
• 3Y*: 28.32%
• 5Y*: 16.28%
• 10Y*: 18.49%

IDGT

• 1D: -1.58%
• 1M: 8.43%
• YTD: 53.90%
• 6M: 49.82%
• 1Y: 63.37%
• 3Y*: 25.08%
• 5Y*: 13.30%
• 10Y*: 14.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIBR vs. IDGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	28.52%	13.06%	18.21%	39.71%	-26.46%	19.67%	50.53%	28.52%	1.47%	18.61%
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF	53.90%	6.79%	26.71%	-6.09%	-17.90%	42.14%	8.78%	17.39%	-1.97%	11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between CIBR and IDGT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015	0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between CIBR and IDGT has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CIBR vs. IDGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CIBR	IDGT
Technology	94.0%	60.7%
Industrials	3.5%	-
Communication Services	2.6%	4.8%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	34.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CIBR vs. IDGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 26
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

IDGT

IDGT Risk / Return Rank: 89
IDGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
IDGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
IDGT Omega Ratio Rank: 84
IDGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
IDGT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIBR vs. IDGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CIBR	IDGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	3.13	-2.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	3.96	-2.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.52	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	7.54	-6.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.79	22.58	-19.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CIBR vs. IDGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the IDGT Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIBR and IDGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CIBR	IDGT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	3.13	-2.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.58	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	0.62	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.18	+0.48

Drawdowns

CIBR vs. IDGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum IDGT drawdown of -77.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and IDGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIBR	IDGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.89%	-77.95%	+44.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.99%	-8.45%	-13.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.99%	-23.74%	+1.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.89%	-35.83%	+1.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.89%	-36.88%	+2.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.81%	-1.58%	-1.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.66%	-19.91%	+11.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.25%	2.81%	+6.44%

Volatility

CIBR vs. IDGT - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a higher volatility of 10.90% compared to iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) at 7.87%. This indicates that CIBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CIBR	IDGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.90%	7.87%	+3.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.90%	16.35%	+4.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.50%	20.41%	+4.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.95%	23.20%	+1.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.60%	23.29%	+0.31%

CIBR vs. IDGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIBR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IDGT's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

CIBR vs. IDGT - Dividend Comparison

CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than IDGT's 0.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.45%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF	0.72%	1.17%	1.64%	0.37%	0.30%	0.28%	0.60%	0.42%	0.65%	0.57%	0.75%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIBR and IDGT in my portfolio?

CIBR and IDGT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CIBR or IDGT?

CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to IDGT (7.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIBR dropped -33.89% vs IDGT's -77.95%.

Which ETF is better, CIBR or IDGT?

On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 18.49% vs 14.38% for IDGT. On fees, IDGT is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, IDGT has been the lower-risk option at 7.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CIBR or IDGT?

Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 14.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CIBR or IDGT?

IDGT is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CIBR or IDGT?

IDGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.

What is the main difference between CIBR and IDGT?

CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CIBR and 0.41% for IDGT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.