CIBR vs. FBTC

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) and FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while FBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CIBR returned 24.35% vs -44.68% for FBTC. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CIBR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FBTC.

Performance

CIBR vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 28.80% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -25.63% return.

CIBR

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 8.67%
• 6M: 27.98%
• YTD: 28.80%
• 1Y: 24.35%
• 3Y*: 26.64%
• 5Y*: 14.23%
• 10Y*: 18.11%
• ALL TIME*: 15.45%

FBTC

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: 3.51%
• 6M: -31.89%
• YTD: -25.63%
• 1Y: -44.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIBR vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	28.80%	13.06%	17.56%
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	-25.63%	-6.56%	94.28%

Correlation

The correlation between CIBR and FBTC is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.34

Return for Risk

CIBR vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 32
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 26

FBTC

FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 2
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIBR vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CIBR	FBTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	-1.01	+1.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	-1.50	+2.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	0.83	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	-0.84	+1.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.58	-1.34	+3.92

CIBR vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIBR Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIBR and FBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CIBR vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum FBTC drawdown of -53.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and FBTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIBR	FBTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.89%	-53.35%	+19.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.99%	-53.35%	+31.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.10%	-48.20%	+45.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.63%	-17.73%	+9.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.48%	33.39%	-23.91%

Volatility

CIBR vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) is 7.70%, while Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has a volatility of 10.58%. This indicates that CIBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CIBR	FBTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.70%	10.58%	-2.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.49%	34.53%	-12.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.82%	44.30%	-18.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.25%	49.71%	-24.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.62%	49.71%	-26.09%

CIBR vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIBR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

CIBR vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.43%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIBR and FBTC in my portfolio?

CIBR and FBTC have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CIBR or FBTC?

FBTC has higher volatility (10.58%) compared to CIBR (7.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIBR dropped -33.89% vs FBTC's -53.35%.

Which ETF is better, CIBR or FBTC?

On 1-year performance, CIBR leads with 24.35% vs -44.68% for FBTC. On fees, FBTC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, CIBR has been the lower-risk option at 7.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CIBR or FBTC?

Over the 1-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 24.35% return vs -44.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CIBR or FBTC?

FBTC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CIBR or FBTC?

CIBR has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.

What is the main difference between CIBR and FBTC?

CIBR is categorized as Cybersecurity, while FBTC is Cryptocurrency. CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while FBTC tracks Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CIBR and 0.25% for FBTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CIBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.