PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIBR vs. CRTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIBR vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 28.52% return, which is significantly higher than CRTC's 8.59% return.


CIBR

1D
-2.81%
1M
31.43%
YTD
28.52%
6M
24.03%
1Y
25.78%
3Y*
28.32%
5Y*
16.28%
10Y*
18.49%

CRTC

1D
-1.08%
1M
4.98%
YTD
8.59%
6M
8.79%
1Y
23.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIBR vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
28.52%13.06%18.21%13.91%
CRTC
Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF
8.59%18.69%18.05%7.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CIBR and CRTC is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2023

0.73

The correlation between CIBR and CRTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

CIBR vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CIBR
CRTC

Technology

94.0%
33.5%

Industrials

3.5%
14.1%

Communication Services

2.6%
16.0%

Basic Materials

-

2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

7.1%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

14.1%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

6.0%

Technology

CIBR
94.0%
CRTC
33.5%

Industrials

CIBR
3.5%
CRTC
14.1%

Communication Services

CIBR
2.6%
CRTC
16.0%

Basic Materials

CIBR

-

CRTC
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

CIBR

-

CRTC
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

CIBR

-

CRTC
0.0%

Energy

CIBR

-

CRTC
7.1%

Financial Services

CIBR

-

CRTC
0.2%

Healthcare

CIBR

-

CRTC
14.1%

Real Estate

CIBR

-

CRTC
0.1%

Utilities

CIBR

-

CRTC
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIBR vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

CRTC
CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIBR vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIBRCRTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.32

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

2.64

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.79

9.88

-7.09

CIBR vs. CRTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the CRTC Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIBR and CRTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIBRCRTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

1.87

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

1.36

-0.69

Drawdowns

CIBR vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, which is greater than CRTC's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and CRTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIBRCRTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.89%

-19.07%

-14.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.99%

-9.05%

-12.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-1.27%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.66%

-2.13%

-6.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.25%

2.41%

+6.84%

Volatility

CIBR vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a higher volatility of 10.90% compared to Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) at 3.20%. This indicates that CIBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIBRCRTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.90%

3.20%

+7.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.90%

9.64%

+11.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.50%

12.76%

+11.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.95%

15.73%

+9.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.60%

15.73%

+7.87%

CIBR vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIBR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CIBR vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison

CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than CRTC's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.45%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
CRTC
Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF
1.00%1.03%1.13%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CIBR and CRTC have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to CRTC (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIBR dropped -33.89% vs CRTC's -19.07%.

On 1-year performance, CIBR leads with 25.78% vs 23.78% for CRTC. On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 25.78% return vs 23.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.

CRTC has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.

CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CIBR and 0.35% for CRTC.

CRTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIBR and CRTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer