CIBR vs. CRTC
CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) and CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - CIBR tracks the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index while CRTC tracks the Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CIBR returned 25.78% vs 23.78% for CRTC. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIBR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CRTC.
Performance
CIBR vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 28.52% return, which is significantly higher than CRTC's 8.59% return.
CIBR
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 31.43%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 24.03%
- 1Y
- 25.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- 18.49%
CRTC
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 8.59%
- 6M
- 8.79%
- 1Y
- 23.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 28.52% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 13.91% |
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF | 8.59% | 18.69% | 18.05% | 7.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIBR and CRTC is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2023 | 0.73 |
The correlation between CIBR and CRTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
CIBR vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CIBR
CRTC
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
CIBR
CRTC
Industrials
CIBR
CRTC
Communication Services
CIBR
CRTC
Basic Materials
CIBR
-
CRTC
Consumer Cyclical
CIBR
-
CRTC
Consumer Defensive
CIBR
-
CRTC
Energy
CIBR
-
CRTC
Financial Services
CIBR
-
CRTC
Healthcare
CIBR
-
CRTC
Real Estate
CIBR
-
CRTC
Utilities
CIBR
-
CRTC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIBR vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank
CIBR
CRTC
CIBR vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIBR | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.32 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 2.64 | -1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.79 | 9.88 | -7.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIBR | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 1.87 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 1.36 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
CIBR vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, which is greater than CRTC's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and CRTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIBR | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -19.07% | -14.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.99% | -9.05% | -12.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -1.27% | -1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.66% | -2.13% | -6.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.25% | 2.41% | +6.84% |
Volatility
CIBR vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a higher volatility of 10.90% compared to Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) at 3.20%. This indicates that CIBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIBR | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.90% | 3.20% | +7.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.90% | 9.64% | +11.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.50% | 12.76% | +11.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.95% | 15.73% | +9.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.60% | 15.73% | +7.87% |
CIBR vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIBR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIBR vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison
CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than CRTC's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.45% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF | 1.00% | 1.03% | 1.13% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIBR and CRTC have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to CRTC (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIBR dropped -33.89% vs CRTC's -19.07%.
On 1-year performance, CIBR leads with 25.78% vs 23.78% for CRTC. On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 25.78% return vs 23.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.
CRTC has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.
CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CIBR and 0.35% for CRTC.
CRTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIBR and CRTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer