CHYM vs. SPGI
Compare and contrast key facts about Chime Financial, Inc (CHYM) and S&P Global Inc. (SPGI).
Performance
CHYM vs. SPGI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CHYM vs. SPGI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CHYM Chime Financial, Inc | -25.59% | -32.17% |
SPGI S&P Global Inc. | -18.42% | 3.69% |
Fundamentals
CHYM:
$7.04B
SPGI:
$128.50B
CHYM:
-$2.71
SPGI:
$14.70
CHYM:
3.19
SPGI:
8.44
CHYM:
$2.19B
SPGI:
$15.34B
CHYM:
$1.92B
SPGI:
$11.65B
CHYM:
-$1.00B
SPGI:
$7.39B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHYM achieves a -25.59% return, which is significantly lower than SPGI's -18.42% return.
CHYM
- 1D
- 7.58%
- 1M
- -15.36%
- YTD
- -25.59%
- 6M
- -7.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPGI
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -3.74%
- YTD
- -18.42%
- 6M
- -12.23%
- 1Y
- -15.63%
- 3Y*
- 8.13%
- 5Y*
- 4.10%
- 10Y*
- 16.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHYM vs. SPGI — Risk / Return Rank
CHYM
SPGI
CHYM vs. SPGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chime Financial, Inc (CHYM) and S&P Global Inc. (SPGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHYM | SPGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.88 | 0.45 | -1.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between CHYM and SPGI is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CHYM vs. SPGI - Dividend Comparison
CHYM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHYM Chime Financial, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPGI S&P Global Inc. | 0.91% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 0.65% | 0.82% | 0.84% | 1.18% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 1.34% |
Drawdowns
CHYM vs. SPGI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHYM drawdown since its inception was -54.22%, smaller than the maximum SPGI drawdown of -74.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHYM and SPGI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHYM | SPGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.22% | -74.67% | +20.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -30.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.53% | -24.15% | -25.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.72% | -15.16% | -18.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.10% | — |
Volatility
CHYM vs. SPGI - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CHYM | SPGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.79% | 29.43% | +36.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.79% | 24.30% | +41.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.79% | 25.92% | +39.87% |
Financials
CHYM vs. SPGI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chime Financial, Inc and S&P Global Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CHYM vs. SPGI - Profitability Comparison
CHYM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Chime Financial, Inc reported a gross profit of 530.25M and revenue of 596.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.9%.
SPGI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, S&P Global Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.92B and revenue of 3.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
CHYM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Chime Financial, Inc reported an operating income of -53.77M and revenue of 596.36M, resulting in an operating margin of -9.0%.
SPGI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, S&P Global Inc. reported an operating income of 1.67B and revenue of 3.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.8%.
CHYM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Chime Financial, Inc reported a net income of -44.78M and revenue of 596.36M, resulting in a net margin of -7.5%.
SPGI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, S&P Global Inc. reported a net income of 1.13B and revenue of 3.92B, resulting in a net margin of 29.0%.