CHYM vs. AVGO
Compare and contrast key facts about Chime Financial, Inc (CHYM) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO).
Performance
CHYM vs. AVGO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CHYM vs. AVGO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CHYM Chime Financial, Inc | -25.98% | -32.17% |
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | -9.23% | 35.97% |
Fundamentals
CHYM:
$7.00B
AVGO:
$1.53T
CHYM:
-$2.71
AVGO:
$5.13
CHYM:
3.17
AVGO:
22.34
CHYM:
$2.19B
AVGO:
$68.28B
CHYM:
$1.92B
AVGO:
$46.31B
CHYM:
-$1.00B
AVGO:
$36.65B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHYM achieves a -25.98% return, which is significantly lower than AVGO's -9.23% return.
CHYM
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -17.64%
- YTD
- -25.98%
- 6M
- -6.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVGO
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- -9.23%
- 6M
- -5.59%
- 1Y
- 87.53%
- 3Y*
- 71.96%
- 5Y*
- 48.74%
- 10Y*
- 38.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHYM vs. AVGO — Risk / Return Rank
CHYM
AVGO
CHYM vs. AVGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chime Financial, Inc (CHYM) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHYM | AVGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.88 | 1.06 | -1.94 |
Correlation
The correlation between CHYM and AVGO is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CHYM vs. AVGO - Dividend Comparison
CHYM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHYM Chime Financial, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 0.79% | 0.70% | 0.94% | 1.71% | 3.02% | 2.24% | 3.05% | 3.54% | 3.11% | 1.87% | 1.43% | 1.13% |
Drawdowns
CHYM vs. AVGO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHYM drawdown since its inception was -54.22%, which is greater than AVGO's maximum drawdown of -48.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHYM and AVGO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHYM | AVGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.22% | -48.30% | -5.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.80% | -23.78% | -26.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.80% | -8.00% | -25.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.66% | — |
Volatility
CHYM vs. AVGO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CHYM | AVGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 32.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.63% | 48.25% | +17.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.63% | 42.33% | +23.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.63% | 38.90% | +26.73% |
Financials
CHYM vs. AVGO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chime Financial, Inc and Broadcom Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CHYM vs. AVGO - Profitability Comparison
CHYM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Chime Financial, Inc reported a gross profit of 530.25M and revenue of 596.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.9%.
AVGO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.16B and revenue of 19.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.1%.
CHYM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Chime Financial, Inc reported an operating income of -53.77M and revenue of 596.36M, resulting in an operating margin of -9.0%.
AVGO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported an operating income of 8.56B and revenue of 19.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 44.3%.
CHYM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Chime Financial, Inc reported a net income of -44.78M and revenue of 596.36M, resulting in a net margin of -7.5%.
AVGO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a net income of 7.35B and revenue of 19.31B, resulting in a net margin of 38.1%.