CHPX vs. UCO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CHPX (Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF) and UCO (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum Index, while UCO is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. CHPX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UCO.

Performance

CHPX vs. UCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPX achieves a 94.06% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's 139.34% return.

CHPX

• 1D: -2.82%
• 1M: 25.89%
• YTD: 94.06%
• 6M: 90.64%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UCO

• 1D: -3.93%
• 1M: -5.57%
• YTD: 139.34%
• 6M: 124.58%
• 1Y: 115.57%
• 3Y*: 24.38%
• 5Y*: 21.18%
• 10Y*: -11.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPX vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CHPX Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF	94.06%	5.55%
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil	139.34%	-13.05%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPX and UCO is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025	-0.19

Return for Risk

CHPX vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCO

UCO Risk / Return Rank: 54
UCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
UCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
UCO Omega Ratio Rank: 51
UCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
UCO Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPX vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHPX	UCO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	5.00	-0.34	+5.34

Drawdowns

CHPX vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPX drawdown since its inception was -15.15%, smaller than the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPX and UCO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHPX	UCO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.15%	-99.95%	+84.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.77%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-50.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-67.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.84%	-99.26%	+96.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.77%	-85.49%	+81.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	18.34%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CHPX	UCO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	20.99%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	46.57%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.38%	57.26%	-18.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.38%	59.81%	-21.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.38%	71.35%	-32.97%

CHPX vs. UCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than UCO's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHPX vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison

CHPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while UCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CHPX Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF	0.03%	0.06%
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHPX and UCO in my portfolio?

CHPX and UCO have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CHPX or UCO?

On fees, CHPX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHPX or UCO?

CHPX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UCO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHPX or UCO?

CHPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for UCO.

What is the main difference between CHPX and UCO?

CHPX is categorized as Semiconductors, while UCO is Leveraged Commodities. CHPX tracks Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum Index, while UCO tracks Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CHPX and 0.95% for UCO.