PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHPX vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHPX vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPX achieves a 60.49% return, which is significantly higher than SMH's 50.09% return.


CHPX

1D
0.65%
1M
-8.69%
6M
45.81%
YTD
60.49%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

SMH

1D
0.30%
1M
-8.74%
6M
33.97%
YTD
50.09%
1Y
90.95%
3Y*
50.56%
5Y*
33.46%
10Y*
34.16%
ALL TIME*
11.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.80M$5.31M$11.57M
$8.28B$7.64B$7.07B

CHPX vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CHPX
Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF
60.49%6.91%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
50.09%10.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPX and SMH is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025

0.94

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHPX vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CHPX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CHPX vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHPXSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.64

CHPX vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHPX vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPX drawdown since its inception was -27.10%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPX and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHPXSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.10%

-84.96%

+57.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.92%

-19.19%

-1.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-40.89%

+35.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.01%

Volatility

CHPX vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHPXSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.96%

38.57%

+6.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.96%

36.50%

+8.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.96%

33.32%

+11.64%

CHPX vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHPX vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

CHPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than SMH's 0.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHPX
Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF
0.04%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.20%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, CHPX and SMH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CHPX.

SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.20%, compared with 0.04% for CHPX.

CHPX is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while SMH is Semiconductors. CHPX tracks Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CHPX and 0.35% for SMH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHPX and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer