CHPX vs. CHPS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CHPX (Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both Semiconductors funds - CHPX tracks the Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum Index while CHPS tracks the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHPX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.

Performance

CHPX vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CHPX having a 99.74% return and CHPS slightly higher at 104.16%.

CHPX

• 1D: 3.45%
• 1M: 35.81%
• YTD: 99.74%
• 6M: 96.47%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPS

• 1D: 4.33%
• 1M: 29.57%
• YTD: 104.16%
• 6M: 109.88%
• 1Y: 222.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPX vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CHPX Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF	99.74%	5.55%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	104.16%	15.65%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPX and CHPS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025	0.92

Return for Risk

CHPX vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 97
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPX vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHPX	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	6.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	5.44	1.78	+3.66

Drawdowns

CHPX vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPX drawdown since its inception was -15.15%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPX and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHPX	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.15%	-39.44%	+24.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.80%	-9.17%	+5.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.50%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CHPX	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.26%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	28.17%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.40%	34.43%	+3.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.40%	33.79%	+4.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.40%	33.79%	+4.61%

CHPX vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHPX vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

CHPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than CHPS's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.33%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%
CHPX Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF	0.03%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHPX and CHPS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, CHPX and CHPS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, CHPX or CHPS?

On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHPX or CHPS?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CHPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHPX or CHPS?

CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.03% for CHPX.

What is the main difference between CHPX and CHPS?

CHPX tracks Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CHPX and 0.15% for CHPS.