CHPS vs. FEDM
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM).
CHPS and FEDM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CHPS is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jul 12, 2023. FEDM is a passively managed fund by FlexShares that tracks the performance of the Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Sep 20, 2021. Both CHPS and FEDM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CHPS vs. FEDM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CHPS vs. FEDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 15.56% | 58.47% | 7.75% | 10.88% |
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund | 0.51% | 26.85% | 2.85% | 3.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPS achieves a 15.56% return, which is significantly higher than FEDM's 0.51% return.
CHPS
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- -5.73%
- YTD
- 15.56%
- 6M
- 33.65%
- 1Y
- 100.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEDM
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 3.68%
- 1Y
- 20.30%
- 3Y*
- 12.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CHPS vs. FEDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHPS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FEDM's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CHPS vs. FEDM — Risk / Return Rank
CHPS
FEDM
CHPS vs. FEDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHPS | FEDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.68 | 1.10 | +1.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.21 | 1.64 | +1.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.23 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.78 | 1.72 | +4.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.15 | 6.47 | +13.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHPS | FEDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | 1.10 | +1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 0.40 | +0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPS and FEDM is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CHPS vs. FEDM - Dividend Comparison
CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than FEDM's 2.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.58% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund | 2.98% | 2.97% | 2.94% | 2.61% | 2.53% | 0.62% |
Drawdowns
CHPS vs. FEDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPS drawdown since its inception was -39.44%, which is greater than FEDM's maximum drawdown of -29.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS and FEDM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPS | FEDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.44% | -29.37% | -10.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.50% | -11.92% | -5.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.07% | -7.11% | -2.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.63% | -7.14% | -2.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.02% | 3.17% | +1.85% |
Volatility
CHPS vs. FEDM - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a higher volatility of 13.34% compared to FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) at 7.48%. This indicates that CHPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CHPS | FEDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.34% | 7.48% | +5.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.34% | 12.93% | +13.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.76% | 18.54% | +19.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.82% | 16.40% | +16.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.82% | 16.40% | +16.42% |