CHIQ vs. MCHI
CHIQ (Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF) and MCHI (iShares MSCI China ETF) are both China Equities funds - CHIQ tracks the MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index while MCHI tracks the MSCI China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CHIQ returned 5.79%/yr vs 4.19%/yr for MCHI. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHIQ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MCHI.
Performance
CHIQ vs. MCHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHIQ achieves a -26.08% return, which is significantly lower than MCHI's -14.90% return. Over the past 10 years, CHIQ has outperformed MCHI with an annualized return of 5.79%, while MCHI has yielded a comparatively lower 4.19% annualized return.
CHIQ
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- -15.21%
- YTD
- -26.08%
- 6M
- -26.95%
- 1Y
- -25.74%
- 3Y*
- -2.12%
- 5Y*
- -13.51%
- 10Y*
- 5.79%
MCHI
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -8.88%
- YTD
- -14.90%
- 6M
- -15.66%
- 1Y
- -6.82%
- 3Y*
- 7.30%
- 5Y*
- -7.48%
- 10Y*
- 4.19%
CHIQ vs. MCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | -26.08% | 13.69% | 10.74% | -10.70% | -22.01% | -27.07% | 92.61% | 44.19% | -28.65% | 67.74% |
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | -14.90% | 31.04% | 17.73% | -11.94% | -23.01% | -21.74% | 27.78% | 23.72% | -19.79% | 54.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHIQ and MCHI is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011 | 0.89 |
The correlation between CHIQ and MCHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
CHIQ vs. MCHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CHIQ
MCHI
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
CHIQ
MCHI
Consumer Defensive
CHIQ
MCHI
Real Estate
CHIQ
MCHI
Technology
CHIQ
MCHI
Industrials
CHIQ
MCHI
Basic Materials
CHIQ
-
MCHI
Communication Services
CHIQ
-
MCHI
Energy
CHIQ
-
MCHI
Financial Services
CHIQ
-
MCHI
Healthcare
CHIQ
-
MCHI
Utilities
CHIQ
-
MCHI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHIQ vs. MCHI — Risk / Return Rank
CHIQ
MCHI
CHIQ vs. MCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHIQ | MCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 0.96 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | -0.30 | -0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.84 | -0.72 | -1.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHIQ vs. MCHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHIQ drawdown since its inception was -67.04%, which is greater than MCHI's maximum drawdown of -62.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIQ and MCHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHIQ | MCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.04% | -62.95% | -4.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.53% | -22.76% | -12.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.53% | -25.85% | -9.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.95% | -56.98% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.04% | -62.95% | -4.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.22% | -41.97% | -19.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.70% | -24.57% | -6.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.03% | 9.49% | +4.54% |
Volatility
CHIQ vs. MCHI - Volatility Comparison
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) has a higher volatility of 6.76% compared to iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) at 6.05%. This indicates that CHIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHIQ | MCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.76% | 6.05% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.27% | 14.90% | +1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.30% | 20.15% | +2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.76% | 30.74% | +7.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.43% | 27.34% | +5.09% |
CHIQ vs. MCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHIQ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MCHI's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHIQ vs. MCHI - Dividend Comparison
CHIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than MCHI's 2.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | 2.00% | 1.48% | 2.65% | 2.26% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.05% | 2.71% | 0.62% | 1.51% | 4.86% |
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | 2.16% | 2.12% | 2.31% | 2.66% | 1.78% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.45% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 2.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHIQ and MCHI have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHIQ has higher volatility (6.76%) compared to MCHI (6.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHIQ dropped -67.04% vs MCHI's -62.95%.
On 10-year performance, CHIQ leads with 5.79% vs 4.19% for MCHI. On fees, MCHI is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, MCHI has been the lower-risk option at 6.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CHIQ has performed better with a 5.79% return vs 4.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MCHI is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CHIQ.
MCHI has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 2.00% for CHIQ.
CHIQ tracks MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index, while MCHI tracks MSCI China Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CHIQ and 0.59% for MCHI.
MCHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.34 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHIQ and MCHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer