CHILX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
CHILX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 26, 2018. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
CHILX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CHILX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHILX BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund | 0.13% | 26.30% | 15.44% | -12.29% | -28.54% | 3.54% | 48.69% | 48.44% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -0.70% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 24.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHILX achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -0.70% return.
CHILX
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 23.88%
- 3Y*
- 6.30%
- 5Y*
- -0.62%
- 10Y*
- —
FASGX
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CHILX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHILX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CHILX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
CHILX
FASGX
CHILX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHILX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.33 | 1.41 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.77 | 2.01 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.30 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 2.00 | -0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.17 | 8.74 | -1.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHILX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 1.41 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.55 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.60 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between CHILX and FASGX is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CHILX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
CHILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than FASGX's 7.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHILX BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund | 2.93% | 2.94% | 2.11% | 2.02% | 0.92% | 1.19% | 3.64% | 12.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.39% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
CHILX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHILX drawdown since its inception was -47.73%, roughly equal to the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHILX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHILX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.73% | -47.35% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.51% | -9.07% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.95% | -23.54% | -20.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.23% | -5.77% | -10.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.75% | -6.74% | -14.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 2.07% | +1.07% |
Volatility
CHILX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) at 5.30%. This indicates that CHILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CHILX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.77% | 5.30% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 8.12% | +3.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.24% | 13.00% | +4.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 12.18% | +7.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 12.58% | +9.29% |