CHILX vs. CNYA
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA).
CHILX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 26, 2018. CNYA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. It was launched on Jun 13, 2016.
Performance
CHILX vs. CNYA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CHILX vs. CNYA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHILX BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund | 0.13% | 26.30% | 15.44% | -12.29% | -28.54% | 3.54% | 48.69% | 48.44% |
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | -0.93% | 26.48% | 10.78% | -13.76% | -26.51% | 3.53% | 41.54% | 37.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHILX achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly higher than CNYA's -0.93% return.
CHILX
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 23.88%
- 3Y*
- 6.30%
- 5Y*
- -0.62%
- 10Y*
- —
CNYA
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -5.18%
- YTD
- -0.93%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- 25.22%
- 3Y*
- 4.59%
- 5Y*
- -1.42%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CHILX vs. CNYA - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHILX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CNYA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CHILX vs. CNYA — Risk / Return Rank
CHILX
CNYA
CHILX vs. CNYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHILX | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.33 | 1.34 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.77 | 1.84 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.27 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 2.15 | -0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.17 | 9.28 | -2.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHILX | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 1.34 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | -0.06 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.23 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between CHILX and CNYA is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CHILX vs. CNYA - Dividend Comparison
CHILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than CNYA's 1.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHILX BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund | 2.93% | 2.94% | 2.11% | 2.02% | 0.92% | 1.19% | 3.64% | 12.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 1.93% | 1.92% | 2.51% | 4.23% | 2.69% | 1.11% | 1.06% | 1.21% | 3.92% | 0.97% | 1.38% |
Drawdowns
CHILX vs. CNYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHILX drawdown since its inception was -47.73%, roughly equal to the maximum CNYA drawdown of -49.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHILX and CNYA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHILX | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.73% | -49.49% | +1.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.51% | -11.47% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.95% | -45.11% | +1.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.23% | -21.52% | +5.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.75% | -20.77% | +0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 2.67% | +0.47% |
Volatility
CHILX vs. CNYA - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) at 4.99%. This indicates that CHILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CHILX | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.77% | 4.99% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 11.62% | -0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.24% | 18.85% | -1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 23.71% | -3.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 23.60% | -1.73% |