PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHILX vs. CNYA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CHILX vs. CNYA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CHILX vs. CNYA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CHILX
BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund
0.13%26.30%15.44%-12.29%-28.54%3.54%48.69%48.44%
CNYA
iShares MSCI China A ETF
-0.93%26.48%10.78%-13.76%-26.51%3.53%41.54%37.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHILX achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly higher than CNYA's -0.93% return.


CHILX

1D
1.14%
1M
-5.75%
YTD
0.13%
6M
1.86%
1Y
23.88%
3Y*
6.30%
5Y*
-0.62%
10Y*

CNYA

1D
0.23%
1M
-5.18%
YTD
-0.93%
6M
1.32%
1Y
25.22%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
-1.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CHILX vs. CNYA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHILX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CNYA's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CHILX vs. CNYA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHILX
CHILX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CHILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHILX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CHILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHILX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

CNYA
CNYA Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CNYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNYA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
CNYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNYA Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHILX vs. CNYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHILXCNYADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.33

1.34

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

1.84

-0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

2.15

-0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.17

9.28

-2.11

CHILX vs. CNYA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHILX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the CNYA Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHILX and CNYA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHILXCNYADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.34

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

-0.06

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.23

+0.26

Correlation

The correlation between CHILX and CNYA is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CHILX vs. CNYA - Dividend Comparison

CHILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than CNYA's 1.93% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CHILX
BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund
2.93%2.94%2.11%2.02%0.92%1.19%3.64%12.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CNYA
iShares MSCI China A ETF
1.93%1.92%2.51%4.23%2.69%1.11%1.06%1.21%3.92%0.97%1.38%

Drawdowns

CHILX vs. CNYA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHILX drawdown since its inception was -47.73%, roughly equal to the maximum CNYA drawdown of -49.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHILX and CNYA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CHILXCNYADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.73%

-49.49%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.51%

-11.47%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.95%

-45.11%

+1.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.23%

-21.52%

+5.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.75%

-20.77%

+0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

2.67%

+0.47%

Volatility

CHILX vs. CNYA - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) at 4.99%. This indicates that CHILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CHILXCNYADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.77%

4.99%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.32%

11.62%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.24%

18.85%

-1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.15%

23.71%

-3.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.87%

23.60%

-1.73%