CHILX vs. FLN
CHILX (BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund) and FLN (First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund) are both funds - CHILX is a China Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while FLN is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Latin America Index. Over the past 5 years, CHILX returned -0.01%/yr vs 11.48%/yr for FLN. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CHILX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FLN.
Performance
CHILX vs. FLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHILX achieves a 5.98% return, which is significantly lower than FLN's 17.41% return.
CHILX
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -4.86%
- 6M
- 2.25%
- YTD
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 23.73%
- 3Y*
- 9.50%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.07%
FLN
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 6.17%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 17.41%
- 1Y
- 43.03%
- 3Y*
- 14.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 8.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.72%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $475.23K | $413.66K | $369.03K |
CHILX vs. FLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHILX BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund | 5.98% | 26.30% | 15.44% | -12.29% | -28.54% | 3.54% | 48.69% | 48.44% |
FLN First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund | 17.41% | 55.05% | -23.10% | 29.68% | 2.73% | -6.94% | -12.27% | 21.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHILX and FLN is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHILX vs. FLN — Risk / Return Rank
CHILX
FLN
CHILX vs. FLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) and First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHILX | FLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.35 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 3.31 | -1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.84 | 8.47 | -2.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHILX vs. FLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHILX drawdown since its inception was -47.73%, smaller than the maximum FLN drawdown of -57.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHILX and FLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHILX | FLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.73% | -57.95% | +10.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.64% | -13.10% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.21% | -25.23% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.88% | -25.95% | -17.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.34% | -5.37% | -5.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.18% | -18.79% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 5.11% | -1.50% |
Volatility
CHILX vs. FLN - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) has a higher volatility of 10.16% compared to First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) at 4.97%. This indicates that CHILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHILX | FLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.16% | 4.97% | +5.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.04% | 17.32% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.70% | 21.23% | -0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 22.53% | -1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.11% | 27.45% | -5.34% |
CHILX vs. FLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHILX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FLN's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHILX vs. FLN - Dividend Comparison
CHILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than FLN's 3.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHILX BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund | 2.77% | 2.94% | 2.11% | 2.02% | 0.92% | 1.19% | 3.64% | 12.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLN First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund | 3.38% | 3.40% | 6.26% | 4.17% | 5.57% | 4.70% | 1.64% | 1.91% | 3.08% | 10.28% | 1.06% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHILX and FLN have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHILX has higher volatility (10.16%) compared to FLN (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHILX dropped -47.73% vs FLN's -57.95%.
FLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHILX and FLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer