CHGX vs. SPYG
CHGX (Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Change Finance Diversified Impact U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free Index, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CHGX returned 11.19%/yr vs 16.07%/yr for SPYG. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHGX charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
CHGX vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHGX achieves a 23.15% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 13.73% return.
CHGX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 9.49%
- YTD
- 23.15%
- 6M
- 22.44%
- 1Y
- 34.23%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 11.19%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 6.54%
- YTD
- 13.73%
- 6M
- 13.08%
- 1Y
- 33.66%
- 3Y*
- 28.20%
- 5Y*
- 16.07%
- 10Y*
- 18.16%
CHGX vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHGX Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 23.15% | 12.13% | 15.16% | 23.65% | -21.77% | 22.72% | 24.10% | 33.07% | -5.79% | 4.34% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 13.73% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 5.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHGX and SPYG is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2017 | 0.81 |
The correlation between CHGX and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CHGX vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CHGX
SPYG
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Technology
CHGX
SPYG
Financial Services
CHGX
SPYG
Healthcare
CHGX
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
CHGX
SPYG
Communication Services
CHGX
SPYG
Industrials
CHGX
SPYG
Real Estate
CHGX
SPYG
Basic Materials
CHGX
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
CHGX
SPYG
Energy
CHGX
SPYG
Utilities
CHGX
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHGX vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
CHGX
SPYG
CHGX vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHGX | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.37 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.05 | 2.46 | +1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.96 | 10.17 | +5.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHGX | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 2.11 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.76 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.35 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
CHGX vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHGX drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHGX and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHGX | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.49% | -67.63% | +32.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.50% | -13.76% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.09% | -22.14% | +4.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.26% | -32.67% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -1.15% | +1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.43% | -24.32% | +17.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 3.32% | -1.17% |
Volatility
CHGX vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) is 3.88%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that CHGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHGX | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 4.34% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.67% | 12.46% | -1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.67% | 16.06% | -2.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.57% | 21.16% | -3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 20.64% | -1.29% |
CHGX vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHGX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHGX vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
CHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, more than SPYG's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHGX Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 0.55% | 0.67% | 0.76% | 0.94% | 1.11% | 0.56% | 0.58% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHGX and SPYG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYG has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to CHGX (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHGX dropped -35.49% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 5-year performance, SPYG leads with 16.07% vs 11.19% for CHGX. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, CHGX has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 16.07% return vs 11.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for CHGX.
CHGX has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.47% for SPYG.
CHGX is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. CHGX tracks Change Finance Diversified Impact U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Change Finance and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for CHGX and 0.04% for SPYG.
CHGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHGX and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer