PortfoliosLab logo
CHGX vs. SUSA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CHGX and SUSA is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

CHGX vs. SUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) and iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

CHGX:

11.12%

SUSA:

12.42%

Max Drawdown

CHGX:

-0.83%

SUSA:

-0.92%

Current Drawdown

CHGX:

-0.04%

SUSA:

-0.21%

Returns By Period


CHGX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SUSA

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CHGX vs. SUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHGX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SUSA's 0.25% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CHGX vs. SUSA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CHGX is 11
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CHGX is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CHGX is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CHGX is 00
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CHGX is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CHGX is 00
Martin Ratio Rank

SUSA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SUSA is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SUSA is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SUSA is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SUSA is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SUSA is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SUSA is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CHGX vs. SUSA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) and iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

CHGX vs. SUSA - Dividend Comparison

CHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than SUSA's 1.16% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CHGX
Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF
1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SUSA
iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF
1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CHGX vs. SUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHGX drawdown since its inception was -0.83%, smaller than the maximum SUSA drawdown of -0.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHGX and SUSA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CHGX vs. SUSA - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...