CHGX vs. DFAU
CHGX (Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF) and DFAU (Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Change Finance Diversified Impact U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free Index, while DFAU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. CHGX is passively managed, while DFAU is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CHGX returned 11.19%/yr vs 13.16%/yr for DFAU. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHGX charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for DFAU.
Performance
CHGX vs. DFAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHGX achieves a 23.15% return, which is significantly higher than DFAU's 11.85% return.
CHGX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 9.49%
- YTD
- 23.15%
- 6M
- 22.44%
- 1Y
- 34.23%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 11.19%
- 10Y*
- —
DFAU
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- YTD
- 11.85%
- 6M
- 11.66%
- 1Y
- 29.14%
- 3Y*
- 22.04%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- —
CHGX vs. DFAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHGX Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 23.15% | 12.13% | 15.16% | 23.65% | -21.77% | 22.72% | 5.95% |
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | 11.85% | 16.78% | 23.17% | 24.79% | -16.99% | 26.89% | 6.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHGX and DFAU is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2020 | 0.94 |
The correlation between CHGX and DFAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
CHGX vs. DFAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CHGX
DFAU
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Technology
CHGX
DFAU
Financial Services
CHGX
DFAU
Healthcare
CHGX
DFAU
Consumer Cyclical
CHGX
DFAU
Communication Services
CHGX
DFAU
Industrials
CHGX
DFAU
Real Estate
CHGX
DFAU
Basic Materials
CHGX
DFAU
Consumer Defensive
CHGX
DFAU
Energy
CHGX
DFAU
Utilities
CHGX
DFAU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHGX vs. DFAU — Risk / Return Rank
CHGX
DFAU
CHGX vs. DFAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHGX | DFAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.44 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.05 | 3.38 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.96 | 15.44 | +0.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHGX | DFAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 2.43 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.78 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.95 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
CHGX vs. DFAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHGX drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, which is greater than DFAU's maximum drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHGX and DFAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHGX | DFAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.49% | -23.61% | -11.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.50% | -8.67% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.09% | -19.36% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.26% | -23.61% | -6.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -0.19% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.43% | -4.98% | -1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 1.89% | +0.26% |
Volatility
CHGX vs. DFAU - Volatility Comparison
Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) at 2.88%. This indicates that CHGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHGX | DFAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 2.88% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.67% | 9.05% | +1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.67% | 12.05% | +1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.57% | 17.02% | +0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 16.73% | +2.62% |
CHGX vs. DFAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHGX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAU's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHGX vs. DFAU - Dividend Comparison
CHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than DFAU's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHGX Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 0.55% | 0.67% | 0.76% | 0.94% | 1.11% | 0.56% | 0.58% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.59% |
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | 0.89% | 0.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHGX and DFAU have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHGX has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to DFAU (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHGX dropped -35.49% vs DFAU's -23.61%.
On 5-year performance, DFAU leads with 13.16% vs 11.19% for CHGX. On fees, DFAU is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DFAU has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DFAU has performed better with a 13.16% return vs 11.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAU is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for CHGX.
DFAU has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.55% for CHGX.
CHGX is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DFAU is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Change Finance and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for CHGX and 0.12% for DFAU.
CHGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHGX and DFAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer