CHGX vs. KRMA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CHGX (Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF) and KRMA (Global X Conscious Companies ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - CHGX tracks the Change Finance Diversified Impact U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free Index while KRMA tracks the Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CHGX returned 11.19%/yr vs 10.98%/yr for KRMA. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHGX charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for KRMA.

Performance

CHGX vs. KRMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) and Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHGX achieves a 23.15% return, which is significantly higher than KRMA's 12.23% return.

CHGX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 9.49%
• YTD: 23.15%
• 6M: 22.44%
• 1Y: 34.23%
• 3Y*: 21.36%
• 5Y*: 11.19%
• 10Y*: —

KRMA

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 5.83%
• YTD: 12.23%
• 6M: 12.43%
• 1Y: 28.28%
• 3Y*: 19.17%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHGX vs. KRMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CHGX Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF	23.15%	12.13%	15.16%	23.65%	-21.77%	22.72%	24.10%	33.07%	-5.79%	4.34%
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF	12.23%	13.98%	18.12%	22.08%	-18.96%	27.71%	17.53%	30.07%	-3.89%	7.04%

Correlation

The correlation between CHGX and KRMA is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2017	0.85

The correlation between CHGX and KRMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

CHGX vs. KRMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CHGX	KRMA
Technology	29.7%	41.8%
Financial Services	17.7%	11.5%
Healthcare	15.7%	8.7%
Consumer Cyclical	12.0%	10.8%
Communication Services	8.9%	9.4%
Industrials	5.8%	7.1%
Real Estate	4.1%	1.9%
Basic Materials	3.3%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	3.5%
Energy	2.2%	2.7%
Utilities	1.0%	0.9%

Return for Risk

CHGX vs. KRMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHGX

CHGX Risk / Return Rank: 78
CHGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
CHGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
CHGX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
CHGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
CHGX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

KRMA

KRMA Risk / Return Rank: 71
KRMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
KRMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
KRMA Omega Ratio Rank: 69
KRMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
KRMA Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHGX vs. KRMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) and Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHGX	KRMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.52	2.31	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.47	3.19	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.41	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.05	3.29	+0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.96	13.96	+2.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHGX vs. KRMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the KRMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHGX and KRMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHGX	KRMA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.52	2.31	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.64	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	0.76	-0.04

Drawdowns

CHGX vs. KRMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHGX drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, roughly equal to the maximum KRMA drawdown of -36.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHGX and KRMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHGX	KRMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.49%	-36.16%	+0.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.50%	-8.62%	+0.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.09%	-19.41%	+1.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.26%	-26.12%	-4.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	-0.65%	+0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.43%	-4.91%	-1.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	2.03%	+0.12%

Volatility

CHGX vs. KRMA - Volatility Comparison

Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) at 3.07%. This indicates that CHGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KRMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHGX	KRMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.88%	3.07%	+0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.67%	9.34%	+1.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.67%	12.30%	+1.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.57%	17.18%	+0.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.35%	18.50%	+0.85%

CHGX vs. KRMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHGX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than KRMA's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHGX vs. KRMA - Dividend Comparison

CHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than KRMA's 2.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CHGX Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF	0.55%	0.67%	0.76%	0.94%	1.11%	0.56%	0.58%	0.86%	0.00%	0.59%	0.00%
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF	2.31%	2.59%	0.91%	1.16%	0.86%	1.07%	0.96%	1.52%	1.82%	1.21%	0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHGX and KRMA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, CHGX and KRMA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CHGX or KRMA?

CHGX has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to KRMA (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHGX dropped -35.49% vs KRMA's -36.16%.

Which ETF is better, CHGX or KRMA?

On 5-year performance, CHGX leads with 11.19% vs 10.98% for KRMA. On fees, KRMA is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, KRMA has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CHGX or KRMA?

Over the 5-year period, CHGX has performed better with a 11.19% return vs 10.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHGX or KRMA?

KRMA is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for CHGX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHGX or KRMA?

KRMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.55% for CHGX.

What is the main difference between CHGX and KRMA?

CHGX tracks Change Finance Diversified Impact U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free Index, while KRMA tracks Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index. They also come from different issuers: Change Finance and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for CHGX and 0.43% for KRMA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.