CHGX vs. KRMA
Compare and contrast key facts about Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) and Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA).
CHGX and KRMA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CHGX is a passively managed fund by Change Finance that tracks the performance of the Change Finance Diversified Impact U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free Index. It was launched on Oct 10, 2017. KRMA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index. It was launched on Jul 11, 2016. Both CHGX and KRMA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CHGX or KRMA.
Correlation
The correlation between CHGX and KRMA is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CHGX vs. KRMA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CHGX:
1.16
KRMA:
1.50
CHGX:
1.63
KRMA:
2.08
CHGX:
1.20
KRMA:
1.27
CHGX:
2.03
KRMA:
2.29
CHGX:
5.38
KRMA:
8.67
CHGX:
2.80%
KRMA:
2.20%
CHGX:
13.00%
KRMA:
12.75%
CHGX:
-35.50%
KRMA:
-36.16%
CHGX:
-1.88%
KRMA:
-0.98%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHGX achieves a 3.85% return, which is significantly higher than KRMA's 3.22% return.
CHGX
3.85%
2.79%
7.54%
13.20%
10.83%
N/A
KRMA
3.22%
2.02%
7.58%
17.53%
11.78%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CHGX vs. KRMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHGX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than KRMA's 0.43% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CHGX vs. KRMA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CHGX
KRMA
CHGX vs. KRMA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) and Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CHGX vs. KRMA - Dividend Comparison
CHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than KRMA's 0.88% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHGX Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 0.73% | 0.76% | 0.94% | 1.11% | 0.56% | 0.58% | 0.86% | 1.21% | 0.30% | 0.00% |
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF | 0.88% | 0.91% | 1.16% | 0.86% | 1.07% | 0.96% | 1.53% | 1.82% | 1.21% | 0.96% |
Drawdowns
CHGX vs. KRMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHGX drawdown since its inception was -35.50%, roughly equal to the maximum KRMA drawdown of -36.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHGX and KRMA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CHGX vs. KRMA - Volatility Comparison
Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF (CHGX) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) at 2.93%. This indicates that CHGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KRMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.