CHAT vs. GXPT
CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) and GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. CHAT is actively managed, while GXPT is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHAT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPT.
Performance
CHAT vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHAT achieves a 63.45% return, which is significantly higher than GXPT's 16.86% return.
CHAT
- 1D
- -7.40%
- 1M
- 7.27%
- YTD
- 63.45%
- 6M
- 62.78%
- 1Y
- 115.67%
- 3Y*
- 51.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXPT
- 1D
- -3.44%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- 16.86%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHAT vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 63.45% | 21.75% |
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 16.86% | 11.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHAT and GXPT is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHAT vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank
CHAT
GXPT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CHAT vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHAT | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.14 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.81 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHAT vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than GXPT's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and GXPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHAT | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -18.74% | -12.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.40% | -8.72% | +1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -5.04% | -0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.86% | — | — |
Volatility
CHAT vs. GXPT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHAT | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.25% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.60% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.87% | 22.91% | +11.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.22% | 22.91% | +8.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.22% | 22.91% | +8.31% |
CHAT vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHAT vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison
CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than GXPT's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.74% | 2.85% |
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 0.12% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHAT and GXPT have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.
CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.12% for GXPT.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CHAT and 0.15% for GXPT.
Find the right allocation for CHAT and GXPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer