PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGXU vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CGXU vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CGXU vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CGXU
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF
1.08%26.31%4.36%15.75%-14.34%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
4.45%35.16%3.15%17.93%-8.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGXU achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 4.45% return.


CGXU

1D
1.29%
1M
-5.62%
YTD
1.08%
6M
4.45%
1Y
27.62%
3Y*
11.48%
5Y*
10Y*

VEA

1D
1.65%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
4.45%
6M
9.91%
1Y
31.74%
3Y*
16.71%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
9.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGXU vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGXU has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CGXU vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGXU
CGXU Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CGXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGXU Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CGXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGXU Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGXU vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGXUVEADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.28

1.81

-0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.81

2.46

-0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.36

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

2.77

-0.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.65

10.77

-3.12

CGXU vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGXU Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGXU and VEA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGXUVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

1.81

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.22

+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between CGXU and VEA is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CGXU vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

CGXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, more than VEA's 2.88% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGXU
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF
5.25%5.31%1.01%0.99%0.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.88%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Drawdowns

CGXU vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGXU drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGXU and VEA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CGXUVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.64%

-60.68%

+35.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.34%

-11.63%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.26%

-7.20%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.85%

-13.39%

+6.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

2.99%

+0.76%

Volatility

CGXU vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) has a higher volatility of 9.98% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) at 7.92%. This indicates that CGXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CGXUVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.98%

7.92%

+2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.62%

11.68%

+3.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.72%

17.67%

+4.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.68%

16.30%

+3.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.68%

17.26%

+2.42%