PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGRO vs. ASHR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGRO vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGRO achieves a -12.97% return, which is significantly lower than ASHR's 4.57% return.


CGRO

1D
0.75%
1M
12.95%
6M
-10.76%
YTD
-12.97%
1Y
-12.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.45%

ASHR

1D
1.27%
1M
-2.30%
6M
3.34%
YTD
4.57%
1Y
23.02%
3Y*
8.56%
5Y*
-0.69%
10Y*
4.85%
ALL TIME*
5.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$123.03M$146.38M$160.76M
$6.01K$9.52K$35.25K

CGRO vs. ASHR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CGRO
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
-12.97%20.23%14.75%1.84%
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF
4.57%27.02%11.95%-3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between CGRO and ASHR is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2023

0.67

The correlation between CGRO and ASHR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGRO vs. ASHR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CGRO
ASHR

Consumer Cyclical

42.4%
5.9%

Industrials

16.4%
16.9%

Communication Services

15.0%
0.6%

Technology

12.8%
30.3%

Healthcare

7.4%
4.3%

Financial Services

2.9%
19.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
6.7%

Real Estate

1.1%
0.5%

Basic Materials

-

9.3%

Energy

-

2.3%

Utilities

-

2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

CGRO
42.4%
ASHR
5.9%

Industrials

CGRO
16.4%
ASHR
16.9%

Communication Services

CGRO
15.0%
ASHR
0.6%

Technology

CGRO
12.8%
ASHR
30.3%

Healthcare

CGRO
7.4%
ASHR
4.3%

Financial Services

CGRO
2.9%
ASHR
19.8%

Consumer Defensive

CGRO
2.0%
ASHR
6.7%

Real Estate

CGRO
1.1%
ASHR
0.5%

Basic Materials

CGRO

-

ASHR
9.3%

Energy

CGRO

-

ASHR
2.3%

Utilities

CGRO

-

ASHR
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGRO vs. ASHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CGRO
CGRO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
CGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

ASHR
ASHR Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ASHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASHR Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
ASHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASHR Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CGRO vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CGROASHRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.21

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.34

2.35

-2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.63

6.73

-7.36

CGRO vs. ASHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGRO Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the ASHR Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGRO and ASHR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CGRO vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGRO drawdown since its inception was -36.53%, smaller than the maximum ASHR drawdown of -51.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGRO and ASHR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGROASHRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.53%

-51.30%

+14.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.53%

-9.84%

-26.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.62%

-19.88%

-5.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.47%

-29.03%

+17.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.35%

3.43%

+15.92%

Volatility

CGRO vs. ASHR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) is 6.15%, while Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR) has a volatility of 8.13%. This indicates that CGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGROASHRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.15%

8.13%

-1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.63%

15.45%

+1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.09%

19.82%

+3.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.67%

23.98%

+4.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.67%

24.21%

+4.46%

CGRO vs. ASHR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGRO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ASHR's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGRO vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison

CGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than ASHR's 2.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF
2.21%2.31%1.13%2.48%1.13%0.88%0.81%0.98%1.32%0.84%0.73%30.13%
CGRO
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
3.22%2.48%2.47%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGRO and ASHR have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASHR has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to CGRO (6.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGRO dropped -36.53% vs ASHR's -51.30%.

On 1-year performance, ASHR leads with 23.02% vs -12.21% for CGRO. On fees, ASHR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CGRO has been the lower-risk option at 6.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ASHR has performed better with a 23.02% return vs -12.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ASHR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CGRO.

CGRO has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 2.21% for ASHR.

They also come from different issuers: CoreValues and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CGRO and 0.65% for ASHR.

ASHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGRO and ASHR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer