PortfoliosLab logo
CGRO vs. CQQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CGRO and CQQQ is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CGRO vs. CQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CGRO:

0.68

CQQQ:

0.37

Sortino Ratio

CGRO:

1.28

CQQQ:

0.88

Omega Ratio

CGRO:

1.17

CQQQ:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

CGRO:

1.15

CQQQ:

0.23

Martin Ratio

CGRO:

2.29

CQQQ:

1.10

Ulcer Index

CGRO:

12.43%

CQQQ:

14.74%

Daily Std Dev

CGRO:

38.74%

CQQQ:

41.95%

Max Drawdown

CGRO:

-24.69%

CQQQ:

-73.99%

Current Drawdown

CGRO:

-10.77%

CQQQ:

-62.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGRO achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly higher than CQQQ's 3.20% return.


CGRO

YTD

10.58%

1M

0.88%

6M

14.88%

1Y

23.10%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CQQQ

YTD

3.20%

1M

-3.10%

6M

0.44%

1Y

15.54%

3Y*

-3.94%

5Y*

-5.41%

10Y*

0.09%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Invesco China Technology ETF

CGRO vs. CQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGRO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CQQQ's 0.70% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGRO vs. CQQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGRO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CGRO is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CGRO is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CGRO is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CGRO is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CGRO is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CGRO is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

CQQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CQQQ is 3838
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CQQQ is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CQQQ is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CQQQ is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CQQQ is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CQQQ is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CGRO vs. CQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CGRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the CQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGRO and CQQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CGRO vs. CQQQ - Dividend Comparison

CGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than CQQQ's 0.27% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CGRO
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
2.23%2.47%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
0.27%0.28%0.55%0.08%0.00%0.47%0.01%0.43%1.42%1.69%1.77%1.00%

Drawdowns

CGRO vs. CQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGRO drawdown since its inception was -24.69%, smaller than the maximum CQQQ drawdown of -73.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGRO and CQQQ.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CGRO vs. CQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) is 7.81%, while Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has a volatility of 9.13%. This indicates that CGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...