CGGG vs. SPYG
CGGG (Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGGG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. CGGG is actively managed, while SPYG is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGGG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
CGGG vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGGG achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 13.73% return.
CGGG
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 6.54%
- YTD
- 13.73%
- 6M
- 13.08%
- 1Y
- 33.66%
- 3Y*
- 28.20%
- 5Y*
- 16.07%
- 10Y*
- 18.16%
CGGG vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF | 1.87% | 10.45% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 13.73% | 13.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGGG and SPYG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGGG vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
CGGG
SPYG
CGGG vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGGG | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.35 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
CGGG vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGGG drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGG and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGGG | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.75% | -67.63% | +49.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.11% | -1.15% | -0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.79% | -24.32% | +20.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.32% | — |
Volatility
CGGG vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGGG | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.46% | 16.06% | +1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 21.16% | -3.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 20.64% | -3.18% |
CGGG vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGGG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGGG vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
CGGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than SPYG's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, CGGG and SPYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for CGGG.
SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.07% for CGGG.
CGGG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGGG and 0.04% for SPYG.
Find the right allocation for CGGG and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer