CGGG vs. FSPGX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CGGG (Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGGG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.

Performance

CGGG vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGGG achieves a -1.93% return, which is significantly lower than FSPGX's 3.18% return.

CGGG

• 1D: -2.10%
• 1M: -2.48%
• YTD: -1.93%
• 6M: -2.47%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FSPGX

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -2.49%
• YTD: 3.18%
• 6M: 1.86%
• 1Y: 19.95%
• 3Y*: 22.60%
• 5Y*: 13.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGGG vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF	-1.93%	10.90%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	3.18%	14.22%

Correlation

The correlation between CGGG and FSPGX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.93

Return for Risk

CGGG vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGGG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 21
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGGG vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGGG	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.32	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.83	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.23	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.32	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.33	—

Drawdowns

CGGG vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGG drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, smaller than the maximum FSPGX drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGG and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGGG	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.75%	-32.66%	+14.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.17%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.32%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.75%	-5.35%	-0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.82%	-6.36%	+2.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.92%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CGGG	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.94%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.61%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.33%	16.21%	+2.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.33%	21.61%	-3.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.33%	21.56%	-3.23%

CGGG vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGGG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGGG vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

CGGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than FSPGX's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF	0.07%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.33%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGGG and FSPGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, CGGG and FSPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.