CFO vs. SPTM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF (CFO) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM).

CFO and SPTM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CFO is a passively managed fund by VictoryShares that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap 500 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Jul 2, 2014. SPTM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Composite 1500 Index. It was launched on Oct 4, 2000. Both CFO and SPTM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CFO vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF (CFO) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CFO vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CFO VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF	0.78%	8.60%	15.37%	-3.56%	-14.46%	26.02%	19.84%	21.64%	-8.81%	22.65%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	-3.88%	16.93%	23.87%	25.55%	-17.75%	28.58%	17.94%	31.34%	-5.30%	21.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFO achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly higher than SPTM's -3.88% return. Over the past 10 years, CFO has underperformed SPTM with an annualized return of 8.98%, while SPTM has yielded a comparatively higher 13.82% annualized return.

CFO

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: -5.28%
• YTD: 0.78%
• 6M: 1.17%
• 1Y: 9.73%
• 3Y*: 7.64%
• 5Y*: 3.82%
• 10Y*: 8.98%

SPTM

• 1D: 2.86%
• 1M: -5.00%
• YTD: -3.88%
• 6M: -1.39%
• 1Y: 17.66%
• 3Y*: 17.75%
• 5Y*: 11.28%
• 10Y*: 13.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFO vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.

CFO

VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF

SPTM

SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF

Return for Risk

CFO vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFO

CFO Risk / Return Rank: 36
CFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
CFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
CFO Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
CFO Martin Ratio Rank: 43

SPTM

SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 64
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 64
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFO vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF (CFO) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CFO	SPTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.62	0.97	-0.35
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	1.48	-0.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.22	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.90	1.51	-0.61
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.12	7.28	-3.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CFO vs. SPTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFO Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the SPTM Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFO and SPTM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CFO	SPTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62	0.97	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.67	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.77	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.43	+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between CFO and SPTM is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CFO vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

CFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than SPTM's 1.20% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFO VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF	1.34%	1.32%	1.44%	1.72%	3.95%	1.06%	0.90%	1.44%	1.49%	1.18%	1.35%	1.31%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	1.20%	1.13%	1.28%	1.44%	1.69%	1.25%	1.56%	1.72%	1.90%	1.66%	1.91%	1.92%

Drawdowns

CFO vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFO drawdown since its inception was -24.35%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFO and SPTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFO	SPTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.35%	-54.80%	+30.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.89%	-12.21%	+0.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.35%	-24.14%	-0.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.35%	-34.66%	+10.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.42%	-6.07%	+0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.68%	-9.10%	+3.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.59%	2.53%	+0.06%

Volatility

CFO vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF (CFO) is 4.20%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that CFO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFO	SPTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	5.32%	-1.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.21%	9.52%	-1.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.84%	18.32%	-2.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.35%	16.88%	-3.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.27%	18.03%	-4.76%