CFO vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CFO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
CFO and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CFO is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap 500 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Jul 2, 2014. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both CFO and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CFO or VOO.
Correlation
The correlation between CFO and VOO is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CFO vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CFO:
1.48
VOO:
2.10
CFO:
2.10
VOO:
2.80
CFO:
1.26
VOO:
1.39
CFO:
0.86
VOO:
3.12
CFO:
7.72
VOO:
13.83
CFO:
2.11%
VOO:
1.90%
CFO:
11.01%
VOO:
12.54%
CFO:
-24.36%
VOO:
-33.99%
CFO:
-5.68%
VOO:
-1.98%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFO achieves a 16.51% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 26.64% return. Over the past 10 years, CFO has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 8.32%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.07% annualized return.
CFO
16.51%
-5.35%
9.03%
15.78%
7.72%
8.32%
VOO
26.64%
-0.83%
9.44%
26.33%
14.77%
13.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CFO vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CFO vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CFO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CFO vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
CFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than VOO's 1.23% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFO VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 1.43% | 1.72% | 3.94% | 1.06% | 0.90% | 1.45% | 1.49% | 1.18% | 1.35% | 1.31% | 0.50% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.23% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
CFO vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFO drawdown since its inception was -24.36%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFO and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CFO vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CFO) is 3.43%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that CFO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.