PortfoliosLab logo
CFO vs. VFLO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CFO and VFLO is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

CFO vs. VFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CFO) and Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CFO:

0.64

VFLO:

0.59

Sortino Ratio

CFO:

0.82

VFLO:

0.86

Omega Ratio

CFO:

1.11

VFLO:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

CFO:

0.49

VFLO:

0.56

Martin Ratio

CFO:

1.70

VFLO:

2.00

Ulcer Index

CFO:

4.92%

VFLO:

5.00%

Daily Std Dev

CFO:

16.68%

VFLO:

19.77%

Max Drawdown

CFO:

-24.36%

VFLO:

-17.79%

Current Drawdown

CFO:

-5.38%

VFLO:

-6.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFO achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly higher than VFLO's 0.04% return.


CFO

YTD

1.31%

1M

4.03%

6M

-5.05%

1Y

10.51%

3Y*

2.30%

5Y*

8.07%

10Y*

8.13%

VFLO

YTD

0.04%

1M

2.67%

6M

-6.27%

1Y

11.48%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CFO vs. VFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than VFLO's 0.39% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CFO vs. VFLO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CFO is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CFO is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CFO is 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CFO is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CFO is 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CFO is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

VFLO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VFLO is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VFLO is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VFLO is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VFLO is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VFLO is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VFLO is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CFO vs. VFLO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CFO) and Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CFO Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is comparable to the VFLO Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFO and VFLO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CFO vs. VFLO - Dividend Comparison

CFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than VFLO's 1.31% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CFO
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
1.33%1.44%1.72%3.94%1.06%0.90%1.45%1.49%1.18%1.35%1.31%0.50%
VFLO
Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF
1.31%1.20%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CFO vs. VFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFO drawdown since its inception was -24.36%, which is greater than VFLO's maximum drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFO and VFLO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CFO vs. VFLO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CFO) is 4.65%, while Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that CFO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...