CFO vs. BDGS
Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CFO) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS).
CFO and BDGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CFO is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap 500 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Jul 2, 2014. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CFO or BDGS.
Correlation
The correlation between CFO and BDGS is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CFO vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CFO:
1.61
BDGS:
4.69
CFO:
2.28
BDGS:
9.20
CFO:
1.29
BDGS:
2.73
CFO:
0.94
BDGS:
8.79
CFO:
8.64
BDGS:
51.25
CFO:
2.05%
BDGS:
0.41%
CFO:
10.99%
BDGS:
4.47%
CFO:
-24.36%
BDGS:
-5.38%
CFO:
-5.05%
BDGS:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFO achieves a 17.29% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's 20.92% return.
CFO
17.29%
-4.14%
9.29%
17.73%
7.87%
8.38%
BDGS
20.92%
2.61%
15.42%
20.98%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CFO vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CFO vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CFO) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CFO vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
CFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while BDGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFO VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 1.42% | 1.72% | 3.94% | 1.06% | 0.90% | 1.45% | 1.49% | 1.18% | 1.35% | 1.31% | 0.50% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 0.00% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CFO vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFO drawdown since its inception was -24.36%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFO and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CFO vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CFO) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 1.56%. This indicates that CFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.