CFO vs. CDL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF (CFO) and VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL).

CFO and CDL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CFO is a passively managed fund by VictoryShares that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap 500 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Jul 2, 2014. CDL is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Jul 8, 2015. Both CFO and CDL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CFO vs. CDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF (CFO) and VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CFO vs. CDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CFO VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF	0.78%	8.60%	15.37%	-3.56%	-14.46%	26.02%	19.84%	21.64%	-8.81%	22.65%
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF	8.87%	9.04%	15.58%	3.03%	-0.45%	33.42%	-3.35%	26.38%	-5.86%	16.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFO achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly lower than CDL's 8.87% return. Over the past 10 years, CFO has underperformed CDL with an annualized return of 8.98%, while CDL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.80% annualized return.

CFO

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: -5.28%
• YTD: 0.78%
• 6M: 1.17%
• 1Y: 9.73%
• 3Y*: 7.64%
• 5Y*: 3.82%
• 10Y*: 8.98%

CDL

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -2.91%
• YTD: 8.87%
• 6M: 8.94%
• 1Y: 12.62%
• 3Y*: 12.90%
• 5Y*: 9.94%
• 10Y*: 10.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFO vs. CDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CFO and CDL have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

CFO

VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF

CDL

VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF

Return for Risk

CFO vs. CDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFO

CFO Risk / Return Rank: 36
CFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
CFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
CFO Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
CFO Martin Ratio Rank: 43

CDL

CDL Risk / Return Rank: 52
CDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
CDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
CDL Omega Ratio Rank: 51
CDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
CDL Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFO vs. CDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF (CFO) and VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CFO	CDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.62	0.93	-0.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	1.33	-0.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.19	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.90	1.24	-0.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.12	5.03	-0.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CFO vs. CDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFO Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the CDL Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFO and CDL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CFO	CDL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62	0.93	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.72	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.64	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.64	-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between CFO and CDL is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CFO vs. CDL - Dividend Comparison

CFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than CDL's 3.18% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFO VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF	1.34%	1.32%	1.44%	1.72%	3.95%	1.06%	0.90%	1.44%	1.49%	1.18%	1.35%	1.31%
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF	3.18%	3.33%	3.27%	3.61%	3.31%	2.60%	3.32%	3.04%	3.32%	2.87%	2.97%	1.28%

Drawdowns

CFO vs. CDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFO drawdown since its inception was -24.35%, smaller than the maximum CDL drawdown of -41.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFO and CDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFO	CDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.35%	-41.03%	+16.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.89%	-11.29%	-0.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.35%	-17.28%	-7.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.35%	-41.03%	+16.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.42%	-3.07%	-2.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.68%	-4.39%	-1.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.59%	2.79%	-0.20%

Volatility

CFO vs. CDL - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF (CFO) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) at 2.95%. This indicates that CFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFO	CDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	2.95%	+1.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.21%	6.97%	+1.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.84%	13.72%	+2.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.35%	13.87%	-0.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.27%	17.05%	-3.78%