CF vs. FLKR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CF (CF Industries Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) is Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Over the past 5 years, CF returned 18.73%/yr vs 18.41%/yr for FLKR. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CF vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CF achieves a 53.39% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 104.96% return.

CF

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: -7.84%
• YTD: 53.39%
• 6M: 47.86%
• 1Y: 31.01%
• 3Y*: 25.38%
• 5Y*: 18.73%
• 10Y*: 17.37%

FLKR

• 1D: -4.41%
• 1M: 16.33%
• YTD: 104.96%
• 6M: 121.64%
• 1Y: 213.10%
• 3Y*: 48.97%
• 5Y*: 18.41%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CF vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CF CF Industries Holdings, Inc.	53.39%	-7.17%	10.08%	-4.75%	22.29%	87.18%	-15.76%	12.73%	5.13%	9.37%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	104.96%	91.91%	-18.84%	19.16%	-27.50%	-7.54%	42.64%	8.88%	-21.30%	2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between CF and FLKR is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017	0.22

The correlation between CF and FLKR shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CF vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CF

CF Risk / Return Rank: 63
CF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
CF Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
CF Omega Ratio Rank: 59
CF Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
CF Martin Ratio Rank: 63

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 96
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CF vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CF	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	5.18	-4.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	4.84	-3.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.67	-0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.25	9.32	-8.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.23	34.49	-32.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CF vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CF Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 5.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CF and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CF	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74	5.18	-4.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.65	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.53	-0.06

Drawdowns

CF vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CF drawdown since its inception was -76.73%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CF and FLKR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CF	FLKR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.73%	-50.06%	-26.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.87%	-23.03%	-1.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.16%	-26.39%	-2.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.36%	-49.51%	+1.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.24%	-6.10%	-8.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.93%	-22.06%	-2.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.95%	6.21%	+7.74%

Volatility

CF vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) is 14.89%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 20.38%. This indicates that CF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CF	FLKR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.89%	20.38%	-5.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.07%	36.87%	-1.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.87%	41.48%	+0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.17%	28.25%	+9.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.40%	27.60%	+12.80%

Dividends

CF vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

CF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than FLKR's 1.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CF CF Industries Holdings, Inc.	1.70%	2.59%	2.34%	2.01%	1.76%	1.70%	3.10%	2.51%	2.76%	2.82%	3.81%	2.94%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	1.89%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CF and FLKR in my portfolio?

CF and FLKR have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CF or FLKR?

FLKR has higher volatility (20.38%) compared to CF (14.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CF dropped -76.73% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.18 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.