CEFA vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CEFA (Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CEFA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the S&P Developed ex-U.S. Catholic Values Index, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CEFA returned 6.64%/yr vs 8.43%/yr for QYLD. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEFA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

CEFA vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CEFA having a 7.81% return and QYLD slightly higher at 7.88%.

CEFA

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 3.62%
• YTD: 7.81%
• 6M: 9.59%
• 1Y: 20.44%
• 3Y*: 15.15%
• 5Y*: 6.64%
• 10Y*: —

QYLD

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 1.62%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 6M: 9.97%
• 1Y: 23.93%
• 3Y*: 13.80%
• 5Y*: 8.43%
• 10Y*: 9.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEFA vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CEFA Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF	7.81%	26.46%	5.03%	17.40%	-16.66%	7.97%	21.61%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	7.88%	9.28%	19.35%	22.77%	-19.08%	10.41%	16.63%

Correlation

The correlation between CEFA and QYLD is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020	0.53

The correlation between CEFA and QYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CEFA vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CEFA	QYLD
Financial Services	26.1%	0.2%
Industrials	19.2%	2.8%
Technology	10.7%	53.8%
Healthcare	10.6%	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	6.7%	7.7%
Basic Materials	5.7%	1.1%
Energy	4.4%	0.6%
Communication Services	3.6%	15.8%
Utilities	3.2%	1.4%
Real Estate	1.3%	0.1%

Return for Risk

CEFA vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEFA

CEFA Risk / Return Rank: 38
CEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
CEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
CEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 37
CEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
CEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 41

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 88
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEFA vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CEFA	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	2.80	-1.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	3.92	-1.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.63	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	4.84	-3.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.54	28.36	-21.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CEFA vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEFA and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CEFA	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.34	2.80	-1.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.58	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.59	+0.04

Drawdowns

CEFA vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEFA drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFA and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CEFA	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.97%	-24.75%	-7.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.54%	-4.97%	-6.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.45%	-19.06%	+3.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.97%	-24.61%	-7.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.47%	-0.06%	-1.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.05%	-3.84%	-3.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	0.85%	+2.28%

Volatility

CEFA vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.85%. This indicates that CEFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CEFA	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.01%	1.85%	+3.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.77%	7.12%	+5.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.33%	8.58%	+6.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.61%	14.70%	+2.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.21%	15.49%	+1.72%

CEFA vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

CEFA vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

CEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than QYLD's 11.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CEFA Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF	2.65%	2.86%	3.26%	2.35%	2.35%	3.49%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.46%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CEFA and QYLD in my portfolio?

CEFA and QYLD have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CEFA or QYLD?

CEFA has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to QYLD (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEFA dropped -31.97% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

Which ETF is better, CEFA or QYLD?

On 5-year performance, QYLD leads with 8.43% vs 6.64% for CEFA. On fees, CEFA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CEFA or QYLD?

Over the 5-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 8.43% return vs 6.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CEFA or QYLD?

CEFA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CEFA or QYLD?

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.46%, compared with 2.65% for CEFA.

What is the main difference between CEFA and QYLD?

CEFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. CEFA tracks S&P Developed ex-U.S. Catholic Values Index, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CEFA and 0.60% for QYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.