PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEFA vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEFA vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEFA achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 13.84% return.


CEFA

1D
-0.72%
1M
1.53%
6M
5.32%
YTD
10.56%
1Y
22.90%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.97%

VEA

1D
-0.66%
1M
-0.27%
6M
7.42%
YTD
13.84%
1Y
29.71%
3Y*
18.08%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
10.05%
ALL TIME*
5.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$214.17K$182.86K$268.34K
$674.44M$796.70M$806.62M

CEFA vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CEFA
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF
10.56%26.46%5.03%17.40%-16.66%7.97%21.61%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
13.84%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%21.22%

Correlation

The correlation between CEFA and VEA is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2020

0.82

The correlation between CEFA and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.96 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CEFA vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CEFA
VEA

Financial Services

26.4%
23.1%

Industrials

18.1%
17.9%

Technology

13.0%
18.4%

Healthcare

10.3%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
5.3%

Basic Materials

5.4%
6.9%

Communication Services

3.6%
3.2%

Energy

3.6%
4.5%

Utilities

3.0%
3.1%

Real Estate

1.1%
2.5%

Financial Services

CEFA
26.4%
VEA
23.1%

Industrials

CEFA
18.1%
VEA
17.9%

Technology

CEFA
13.0%
VEA
18.4%

Healthcare

CEFA
10.3%
VEA
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

CEFA
8.6%
VEA
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

CEFA
6.8%
VEA
5.3%

Basic Materials

CEFA
5.4%
VEA
6.9%

Communication Services

CEFA
3.6%
VEA
3.2%

Energy

CEFA
3.6%
VEA
4.5%

Utilities

CEFA
3.0%
VEA
3.1%

Real Estate

CEFA
1.1%
VEA
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEFA vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CEFA
CEFA Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
CEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CEFA vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CEFAVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.31

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

2.53

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.23

9.44

-2.21

CEFA vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEFA and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CEFA vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEFA drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFA and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEFAVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.97%

-60.68%

+28.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.54%

-11.63%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.45%

-13.45%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.97%

-29.71%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-2.45%

+1.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.90%

-13.20%

+6.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

3.10%

+0.03%

Volatility

CEFA vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) is 4.70%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that CEFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEFAVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

5.40%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.09%

15.40%

-1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.20%

17.25%

-1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.70%

16.84%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.23%

17.21%

+0.02%

CEFA vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

CEFA vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

CEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than VEA's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEFA
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF
2.68%2.86%3.26%2.35%2.35%3.49%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.57%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, CEFA and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEA has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to CEFA (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEFA dropped -31.97% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 5-year performance, VEA leads with 9.76% vs 7.72% for CEFA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, CEFA has been the lower-risk option at 4.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VEA has performed better with a 9.76% return vs 7.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CEFA.

CEFA has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 2.57% for VEA.

CEFA tracks S&P Developed ex-U.S. Catholic Values Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CEFA and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEFA and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer