PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEFA vs. FTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEFA vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEFA achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 31.89% return.


CEFA

1D
-0.77%
1M
3.62%
YTD
7.81%
6M
9.59%
1Y
20.44%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
6.64%
10Y*

FTEC

1D
-1.49%
1M
18.21%
YTD
31.89%
6M
30.74%
1Y
60.87%
3Y*
33.93%
5Y*
22.49%
10Y*
25.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEFA vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CEFA
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF
7.81%26.46%5.03%17.40%-16.66%7.97%21.61%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
31.89%22.11%29.40%53.30%-29.59%30.49%30.30%

Correlation

The correlation between CEFA and FTEC is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020

0.54

The correlation between CEFA and FTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

CEFA vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CEFA
FTEC

Financial Services

26.1%
0.6%

Industrials

19.2%
0.6%

Technology

10.7%
98.0%

Healthcare

10.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%

-

Basic Materials

5.7%

-

Energy

4.4%
0.4%

Communication Services

3.6%
0.0%

Utilities

3.2%

-

Real Estate

1.3%

-

Financial Services

CEFA
26.1%
FTEC
0.6%

Industrials

CEFA
19.2%
FTEC
0.6%

Technology

CEFA
10.7%
FTEC
98.0%

Healthcare

CEFA
10.6%
FTEC

-

Consumer Cyclical

CEFA
8.7%
FTEC
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

CEFA
6.7%
FTEC

-

Basic Materials

CEFA
5.7%
FTEC

-

Energy

CEFA
4.4%
FTEC
0.4%

Communication Services

CEFA
3.6%
FTEC
0.0%

Utilities

CEFA
3.2%
FTEC

-

Real Estate

CEFA
1.3%
FTEC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEFA vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEFA
CEFA Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
CEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEFA vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEFAFTECDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.34

2.97

-1.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.94

3.65

-1.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.48

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

3.76

-1.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.54

12.10

-5.56

CEFA vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEFA and FTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEFAFTECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

2.97

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.90

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.99

-0.35

Drawdowns

CEFA vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEFA drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, smaller than the maximum FTEC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFA and FTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEFAFTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.97%

-34.95%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.54%

-16.26%

+4.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.45%

-27.30%

+11.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.97%

-34.95%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-1.49%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.05%

-5.56%

-1.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

5.05%

-1.92%

Volatility

CEFA vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) is 5.01%, while Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that CEFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEFAFTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

6.43%

-1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.77%

16.14%

-3.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.33%

20.63%

-5.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.61%

25.23%

-7.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.21%

24.69%

-7.48%

CEFA vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

CEFA vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

CEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than FTEC's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEFA
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF
2.65%2.86%3.26%2.35%2.35%3.49%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.32%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


CEFA and FTEC have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTEC has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to CEFA (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEFA dropped -31.97% vs FTEC's -34.95%.

On 5-year performance, FTEC leads with 22.49% vs 6.64% for CEFA. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, CEFA has been the lower-risk option at 5.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 22.49% return vs 6.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CEFA.

CEFA has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 0.32% for FTEC.

CEFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FTEC is Technology Equities. CEFA tracks S&P Developed ex-U.S. Catholic Values Index, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CEFA and 0.08% for FTEC.

FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEFA and FTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer