CEFA vs. PAVE
CEFA (Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CEFA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the S&P Developed ex-U.S. Catholic Values Index, while PAVE is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CEFA returned 6.64%/yr vs 17.39%/yr for PAVE. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEFA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
CEFA vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEFA achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 19.88% return.
CEFA
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 7.81%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- 1Y
- 20.44%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- —
PAVE
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 19.88%
- 6M
- 18.87%
- 1Y
- 37.15%
- 3Y*
- 26.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.39%
- 10Y*
- —
CEFA vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFA Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF | 7.81% | 26.46% | 5.03% | 17.40% | -16.66% | 7.97% | 21.61% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 19.88% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 45.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEFA and PAVE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020 | 0.58 |
The correlation between CEFA and PAVE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
CEFA vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CEFA
PAVE
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
CEFA
PAVE
-
Industrials
CEFA
PAVE
Technology
CEFA
PAVE
Healthcare
CEFA
PAVE
-
Consumer Cyclical
CEFA
PAVE
-
Consumer Defensive
CEFA
PAVE
Basic Materials
CEFA
PAVE
Energy
CEFA
PAVE
Communication Services
CEFA
PAVE
-
Utilities
CEFA
PAVE
Real Estate
CEFA
PAVE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEFA vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
CEFA
PAVE
CEFA vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEFA | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 1.99 | -0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 2.82 | -0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.34 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 3.13 | -1.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.54 | 11.50 | -4.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEFA | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 1.99 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.81 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.68 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
CEFA vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEFA drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, smaller than the maximum PAVE drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFA and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEFA | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.97% | -44.08% | +12.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.54% | -11.91% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.45% | -26.23% | +10.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.97% | -26.23% | -5.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -1.82% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.05% | -6.24% | -0.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 3.24% | -0.11% |
Volatility
CEFA vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) is 5.01%, while Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that CEFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEFA | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 6.42% | -1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.77% | 15.17% | -2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 18.84% | -3.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.61% | 21.60% | -3.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 24.38% | -7.17% |
CEFA vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEFA vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
CEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than PAVE's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFA Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF | 2.65% | 2.86% | 3.26% | 2.35% | 2.35% | 3.49% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEFA and PAVE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAVE has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to CEFA (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEFA dropped -31.97% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.39% vs 6.64% for CEFA. On fees, CEFA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CEFA has been the lower-risk option at 5.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.39% return vs 6.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CEFA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for PAVE.
CEFA has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 0.77% for PAVE.
CEFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while PAVE is Utilities Equities. CEFA tracks S&P Developed ex-U.S. Catholic Values Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CEFA and 0.47% for PAVE.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CEFA and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer