PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDP vs. PLOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CDP vs. PLOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in COPT Defense Properties (CDP) and Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDP achieves a 22.45% return, which is significantly lower than PLOW's 54.84% return. Over the past 10 years, CDP has underperformed PLOW with an annualized return of 6.08%, while PLOW has yielded a comparatively higher 10.83% annualized return.


CDP

1D
0.51%
1M
4.86%
YTD
22.45%
6M
21.82%
1Y
23.25%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
6.08%

PLOW

1D
0.97%
1M
13.56%
YTD
54.84%
6M
49.66%
1Y
82.83%
3Y*
24.80%
5Y*
8.24%
10Y*
10.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDP vs. PLOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDP
COPT Defense Properties
22.45%-6.17%26.17%3.65%-3.26%11.61%-7.07%45.28%-24.78%-3.24%
PLOW
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
54.84%43.83%-16.47%-14.72%-4.01%-6.11%-19.64%57.21%-2.68%15.63%

Correlation

The correlation between CDP and PLOW is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2010

0.35

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CDP:

$15.90M

PLOW:

$1.18B

EPS

CDP:

$1.83

PLOW:

$272.12

PE Ratio

CDP:

18.36

PLOW:

0.18

PEG Ratio

CDP:

0.78

PLOW:

0.01

PS Ratio

CDP:

3.69

PLOW:

1.73

PB Ratio

CDP:

0.01

PLOW:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

CDP:

$776.70M

PLOW:

$678.78M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CDP:

$326.28M

PLOW:

$181.26M

EBITDA (TTM)

CDP:

$368.96M

PLOW:

$96.05M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDP vs. PLOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDP
CDP Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDP Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDP Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PLOW
PLOW Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PLOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLOW Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PLOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLOW Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDP vs. PLOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COPT Defense Properties (CDP) and Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDPPLOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.45

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

5.42

-3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.78

12.60

-6.81

CDP vs. PLOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDP Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the PLOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDP and PLOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDP vs. PLOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDP drawdown since its inception was -59.36%, which is greater than PLOW's maximum drawdown of -55.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDP and PLOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDPPLOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.36%

-55.53%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-15.37%

+4.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.66%

-32.38%

+8.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.66%

-47.68%

+24.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.67%

-55.53%

+6.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-1.07%

-1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.86%

-18.33%

-1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

6.60%

-2.57%

Volatility

CDP vs. PLOW - Volatility Comparison

COPT Defense Properties (CDP) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW) at 6.19%. This indicates that CDP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDPPLOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.58%

6.19%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.90%

26.32%

-12.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.07%

32.34%

-14.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.09%

32.61%

-9.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.33%

34.83%

-8.50%

Dividends

CDP vs. PLOW - Dividend Comparison

CDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than PLOW's 2.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDP
COPT Defense Properties
3.67%4.39%3.81%4.45%4.24%3.93%4.22%3.74%5.23%3.77%3.52%5.04%
PLOW
Douglas Dynamics, Inc.
2.37%3.61%4.99%3.98%3.21%2.92%2.62%1.98%2.95%2.54%2.79%4.22%

Financials

CDP vs. PLOW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between COPT Defense Properties and Douglas Dynamics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00M160.00M180.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
200.64M
137.80M
(CDP) Total Revenue
(PLOW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CDP and PLOW have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDP has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to PLOW (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDP dropped -59.36% vs PLOW's -55.53%.

PLOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDP and PLOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer