CDL vs. RDIV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CDL (VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) and RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CDL is a Dividend fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while RDIV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CDL returned 11.17%/yr vs 11.30%/yr for RDIV. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CDL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RDIV.

Performance

CDL vs. RDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDL achieves a 17.17% return, which is significantly lower than RDIV's 22.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CDL having a 11.17% annualized return and RDIV not far ahead at 11.30%.

CDL

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 0.29%
• 6M: 10.38%
• YTD: 17.17%
• 1Y: 22.30%
• 3Y*: 14.61%
• 5Y*: 10.44%
• 10Y*: 11.17%
• ALL TIME*: 11.29%

RDIV

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 6.60%
• 6M: 17.44%
• YTD: 22.74%
• 1Y: 36.48%
• 3Y*: 19.58%
• 5Y*: 13.86%
• 10Y*: 11.30%
• ALL TIME*: 11.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF	$504.48K	$625.50K	$553.90K
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF	$3.34M	$2.84M	$4.35M

CDL vs. RDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF	17.17%	9.04%	15.58%	3.03%	-0.45%	33.42%	-3.35%	26.38%	-5.86%	16.29%
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF	22.74%	12.36%	15.17%	4.66%	7.16%	29.12%	-9.31%	22.62%	-4.78%	11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between CDL and RDIV is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015	0.87

The correlation between CDL and RDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CDL vs. RDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CDL	RDIV
Utilities	24.3%	6.4%
Financial Services	24.1%	19.2%
Consumer Defensive	15.7%	15.4%
Energy	8.6%	17.0%
Healthcare	7.2%	6.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.0%	14.5%
Technology	6.9%	5.1%
Communication Services	3.9%	8.0%
Industrials	2.3%	-
Basic Materials	0.0%	0.5%
Real Estate	0.0%	7.6%

Return for Risk

CDL vs. RDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CDL

CDL Risk / Return Rank: 88
CDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CDL Omega Ratio Rank: 84
CDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CDL Martin Ratio Rank: 89

RDIV

RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 95
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 92
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CDL vs. RDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CDL	RDIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	2.61	-0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	3.77	-0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.45	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.87	7.24	-3.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.78	22.00	-8.23

CDL vs. RDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDL Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the RDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDL and RDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CDL vs. RDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDL drawdown since its inception was -41.03%, smaller than the maximum RDIV drawdown of -49.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDL and RDIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	CDL	RDIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.03%	-49.97%	+8.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.66%	-4.84%	-0.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.87%	-17.91%	+5.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.28%	-24.89%	+7.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.03%	-49.97%	+8.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.35%	-1.46%	-0.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.29%	-5.80%	+1.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.59%	1.59%	0.00%

Volatility

CDL vs. RDIV - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) at 4.00%. This indicates that CDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CDL	RDIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	4.00%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.85%	9.25%	-1.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.34%	13.49%	-3.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.88%	17.41%	-3.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.04%	21.85%	-4.81%

CDL vs. RDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RDIV's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

CDL vs. RDIV - Dividend Comparison

CDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than RDIV's 3.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF	3.06%	3.33%	3.27%	3.61%	3.31%	2.60%	3.32%	3.04%	3.32%	2.87%	2.97%	1.28%
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF	3.45%	3.94%	4.08%	3.93%	3.44%	3.31%	4.93%	3.84%	4.32%	4.26%	2.20%	4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CDL and RDIV in my portfolio?

CDL and RDIV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CDL or RDIV?

CDL has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to RDIV (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDL dropped -41.03% vs RDIV's -49.97%.

Which ETF is better, CDL or RDIV?

On 10-year performance, RDIV leads with 11.30% vs 11.17% for CDL. On fees, CDL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CDL or RDIV?

Over the 10-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 11.30% return vs 11.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CDL or RDIV?

CDL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CDL or RDIV?

RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 3.06% for CDL.

What is the main difference between CDL and RDIV?

CDL is categorized as Dividend, while RDIV is Mid Cap Value Equities. CDL tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CDL and 0.39% for RDIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.