PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDEI vs. IWF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDEI vs. IWF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDEI achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly higher than IWF's 7.11% return.


CDEI

1D
-0.11%
1M
4.86%
YTD
9.87%
6M
10.18%
1Y
28.56%
3Y*
19.47%
5Y*
10Y*

IWF

1D
-1.29%
1M
5.68%
YTD
7.11%
6M
6.51%
1Y
25.60%
3Y*
24.80%
5Y*
15.24%
10Y*
18.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDEI vs. IWF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CDEI
Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF
9.87%16.60%18.67%20.47%
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
7.11%18.33%33.12%29.36%

Correlation

The correlation between CDEI and IWF is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023

0.93

The correlation between CDEI and IWF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

CDEI vs. IWF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CDEI
IWF

Technology

40.9%
53.2%

Financial Services

15.6%
4.9%

Communication Services

12.3%
12.3%

Healthcare

9.8%
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%
12.7%

Industrials

5.2%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
2.5%

Utilities

2.3%
1.1%

Real Estate

1.6%
0.4%

Energy

0.5%
0.4%

Basic Materials

0.3%
0.3%

Technology

CDEI
40.9%
IWF
53.2%

Financial Services

CDEI
15.6%
IWF
4.9%

Communication Services

CDEI
12.3%
IWF
12.3%

Healthcare

CDEI
9.8%
IWF
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

CDEI
6.5%
IWF
12.7%

Industrials

CDEI
5.2%
IWF
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

CDEI
4.9%
IWF
2.5%

Utilities

CDEI
2.3%
IWF
1.1%

Real Estate

CDEI
1.6%
IWF
0.4%

Energy

CDEI
0.5%
IWF
0.4%

Basic Materials

CDEI
0.3%
IWF
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDEI vs. IWF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDEI
CDEI Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CDEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDEI Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CDEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDEI Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

IWF
IWF Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWF Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWF Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDEI vs. IWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDEIIWFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.39

1.67

+0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.30

2.29

+1.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.29

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

1.58

+1.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.67

5.28

+7.39

CDEI vs. IWF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDEI Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the IWF Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDEI and IWF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CDEIIWFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

1.67

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.34

0.40

+0.94

Drawdowns

CDEI vs. IWF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDEI drawdown since its inception was -19.46%, smaller than the maximum IWF drawdown of -64.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDEI and IWF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDEIIWFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.46%

-64.25%

+44.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.88%

-16.27%

+6.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.46%

-23.36%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-1.66%

+1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-22.08%

+19.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

4.86%

-2.59%

Volatility

CDEI vs. IWF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) is 2.78%, while iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that CDEI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDEIIWFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

3.61%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

11.66%

-2.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.99%

15.44%

-3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.02%

21.40%

-6.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

20.97%

-5.95%

CDEI vs. IWF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDEI has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than IWF's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CDEI vs. IWF - Dividend Comparison

CDEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than IWF's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDEI
Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF
0.96%1.05%1.22%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.33%0.36%0.46%0.67%0.91%0.49%0.66%0.99%1.27%1.10%1.43%1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDEI and IWF have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWF has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to CDEI (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDEI dropped -19.46% vs IWF's -64.25%.

On 3-year performance, IWF leads with 24.80% vs 19.47% for CDEI. On fees, CDEI is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, CDEI has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IWF has performed better with a 24.80% return vs 19.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CDEI is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IWF.

CDEI has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.33% for IWF.

CDEI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IWF is Large Cap Growth Equities. CDEI tracks Russell 1000 Index, while IWF tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for CDEI and 0.19% for IWF.

CDEI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDEI and IWF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer