PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDEI vs. CVMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CDEI vs. CVMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) and Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CDEI vs. CVMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CDEI
Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF
-5.10%16.60%18.67%20.47%
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
1.05%9.52%12.57%4.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDEI achieves a -5.10% return, which is significantly lower than CVMC's 1.05% return.


CDEI

1D
0.93%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
-5.10%
6M
-1.22%
1Y
17.27%
3Y*
15.97%
5Y*
10Y*

CVMC

1D
0.97%
1M
-5.26%
YTD
1.05%
6M
2.39%
1Y
15.24%
3Y*
11.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CDEI vs. CVMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDEI has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than CVMC's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

CDEI vs. CVMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDEI
CDEI Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
CDEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDEI Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CDEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDEI Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

CVMC
CVMC Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
CVMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVMC Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
CVMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVMC Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDEI vs. CVMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) and Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDEICVMCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.94

0.77

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.46

1.25

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.17

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

1.10

+0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.37

5.09

+1.28

CDEI vs. CVMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDEI Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the CVMC Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDEI and CVMC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CDEICVMCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

0.77

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.53

+0.51

Correlation

The correlation between CDEI and CVMC is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CDEI vs. CVMC - Dividend Comparison

CDEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than CVMC's 1.34% yield.


Drawdowns

CDEI vs. CVMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDEI drawdown since its inception was -19.46%, smaller than the maximum CVMC drawdown of -22.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDEI and CVMC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CDEICVMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.46%

-22.53%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.14%

-14.14%

+2.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.47%

-5.87%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.36%

-4.35%

+1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

3.05%

-0.29%

Volatility

CDEI vs. CVMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) is 5.31%, while Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) has a volatility of 5.72%. This indicates that CDEI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CDEICVMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

5.72%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.56%

10.55%

-0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.46%

19.91%

-1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.18%

16.54%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.18%

16.54%

-1.36%