CDC vs. CFO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CDC (VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF) and CFO (VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CDC is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index, while CFO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap 500 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CDC returned 10.03%/yr vs 9.36%/yr for CFO. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CDC charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CFO.

Performance

CDC vs. CFO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF (CFO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDC achieves a 10.57% return, which is significantly higher than CFO's 6.66% return. Over the past 10 years, CDC has outperformed CFO with an annualized return of 10.03%, while CFO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.36% annualized return.

CDC

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -0.39%
• YTD: 10.57%
• 6M: 10.29%
• 1Y: 18.16%
• 3Y*: 11.97%
• 5Y*: 5.08%
• 10Y*: 10.03%

CFO

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 1.87%
• YTD: 6.66%
• 6M: 6.96%
• 1Y: 13.59%
• 3Y*: 10.44%
• 5Y*: 3.88%
• 10Y*: 9.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDC vs. CFO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF	10.57%	8.96%	14.48%	-4.99%	-7.86%	33.05%	12.88%	19.64%	-5.97%	15.77%
CFO VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF	6.66%	8.60%	15.37%	-3.56%	-14.46%	26.02%	19.84%	21.64%	-8.81%	22.65%

Correlation

The correlation between CDC and CFO is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2014	0.83

The correlation between CDC and CFO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

CDC vs. CFO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CDC	CFO
Utilities	24.3%	9.0%
Financial Services	23.4%	18.3%
Consumer Defensive	15.9%	6.8%
Energy	9.5%	5.5%
Technology	6.9%	14.9%
Healthcare	6.8%	9.5%
Consumer Cyclical	6.6%	9.8%
Communication Services	4.4%	3.6%
Industrials	2.3%	18.4%
Basic Materials	0.0%	3.6%
Real Estate	0.0%	0.5%

Return for Risk

CDC vs. CFO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDC

CDC Risk / Return Rank: 58
CDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
CDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
CDC Omega Ratio Rank: 50
CDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CDC Martin Ratio Rank: 63

CFO

CFO Risk / Return Rank: 38
CFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
CFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
CFO Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
CFO Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDC vs. CFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF (CFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CDC	CFO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	1.27	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	1.88	+0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.22	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	1.92	+1.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.37	7.10	+4.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CDC vs. CFO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDC Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the CFO Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDC and CFO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CDC	CFO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87	1.27	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.29	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	0.71	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.65	+0.09

Drawdowns

CDC vs. CFO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDC drawdown since its inception was -21.37%, smaller than the maximum CFO drawdown of -24.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDC and CFO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CDC	CFO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.37%	-24.35%	+2.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.67%	-7.10%	+1.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.70%	-17.25%	+4.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.37%	-24.35%	+2.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.37%	-24.35%	+2.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.20%	-0.30%	-1.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.09%	-5.62%	+0.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	1.92%	-0.32%

Volatility

CDC vs. CFO - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF (CFO) at 2.42%. This indicates that CDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CFO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CDC	CFO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	2.42%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.84%	7.79%	-0.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.77%	10.75%	-0.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.54%	13.32%	-0.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.21%	13.27%	-0.06%

CDC vs. CFO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDC has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than CFO's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

CDC vs. CFO - Dividend Comparison

CDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than CFO's 1.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF	3.18%	3.36%	3.32%	4.24%	3.48%	2.65%	2.48%	3.04%	3.37%	2.81%	2.99%	3.17%
CFO VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Weighted ETF	1.24%	1.32%	1.44%	1.72%	3.95%	1.06%	0.90%	1.44%	1.49%	1.18%	1.35%	1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CDC and CFO in my portfolio?

CDC and CFO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CDC or CFO?

CDC has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to CFO (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDC dropped -21.37% vs CFO's -24.35%.

Which ETF is better, CDC or CFO?

On 10-year performance, CDC leads with 10.03% vs 9.36% for CFO. On fees, CFO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CFO has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CDC or CFO?

Over the 10-year period, CDC has performed better with a 10.03% return vs 9.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CDC or CFO?

CFO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for CDC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CDC or CFO?

CDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 1.24% for CFO.

What is the main difference between CDC and CFO?

CDC is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while CFO is Large Cap Blend Equities. CDC tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index, while CFO tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap 500 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for CDC and 0.35% for CFO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.