PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDC vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDC vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDC achieves a 12.98% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 18.60% return. Over the past 10 years, CDC has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 10.25%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.64% annualized return.


CDC

1D
0.42%
1M
2.37%
YTD
12.98%
6M
12.80%
1Y
19.54%
3Y*
12.61%
5Y*
5.65%
10Y*
10.25%

SCHD

1D
-0.40%
1M
1.61%
YTD
18.60%
6M
18.00%
1Y
24.33%
3Y*
14.69%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*
12.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDC vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDC
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
12.98%8.96%14.48%-4.99%-7.86%33.05%12.88%19.64%-5.97%15.77%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
18.60%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between CDC and SCHD is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2014

0.89

The correlation between CDC and SCHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

CDC vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CDC
SCHD

Utilities

24.3%
0.0%

Financial Services

23.4%
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

15.9%
19.2%

Energy

9.5%
16.2%

Technology

6.9%
16.4%

Healthcare

6.8%
18.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
6.3%

Communication Services

4.4%
6.3%

Industrials

2.3%
7.5%

Basic Materials

0.0%
1.2%

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Utilities

CDC
24.3%
SCHD
0.0%

Financial Services

CDC
23.4%
SCHD
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

CDC
15.9%
SCHD
19.2%

Energy

CDC
9.5%
SCHD
16.2%

Technology

CDC
6.9%
SCHD
16.4%

Healthcare

CDC
6.8%
SCHD
18.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CDC
6.6%
SCHD
6.3%

Communication Services

CDC
4.4%
SCHD
6.3%

Industrials

CDC
2.3%
SCHD
7.5%

Basic Materials

CDC
0.0%
SCHD
1.2%

Real Estate

CDC
0.0%
SCHD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDC vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDC
CDC Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDC vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDCSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.40

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

5.30

-1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.19

12.94

-0.75

CDC vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDC Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDC and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDC vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDC drawdown since its inception was -21.37%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDC and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDCSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.37%

-33.37%

+12.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.67%

-4.61%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.70%

-16.13%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.37%

-16.85%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.37%

-33.37%

+12.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-1.74%

+1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-3.32%

-1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.89%

-0.28%

Volatility

CDC vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.86%. This indicates that CDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDCSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

2.86%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.90%

7.59%

-0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.82%

10.93%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.56%

14.38%

-1.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.22%

16.72%

-3.50%

CDC vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDC has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDC vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

CDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, less than SCHD's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDC
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
3.17%3.36%3.32%4.24%3.48%2.65%2.48%3.04%3.37%2.81%2.99%3.17%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.27%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDC and SCHD have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDC has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to SCHD (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDC dropped -21.37% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.64% vs 10.25% for CDC. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 10.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for CDC.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 3.17% for CDC.

CDC is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. CDC tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for CDC and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDC and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer