PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDC vs. DIA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDC vs. DIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDC achieves a 17.48% return, which is significantly higher than DIA's 9.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CDC has underperformed DIA with an annualized return of 10.37%, while DIA has yielded a comparatively higher 13.26% annualized return.


CDC

1D
-0.37%
1M
0.43%
6M
10.50%
YTD
17.48%
1Y
22.44%
3Y*
13.45%
5Y*
6.78%
10Y*
10.37%
ALL TIME*
10.00%

DIA

1D
0.54%
1M
-0.65%
6M
8.01%
YTD
9.95%
1Y
22.15%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*
13.26%
ALL TIME*
9.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.05M$965.48K$1.21M
$2.05B$1.95B$2.38B

CDC vs. DIA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDC
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
17.48%8.96%14.48%-4.99%-7.86%33.05%12.88%19.64%-5.97%15.77%
DIA
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
9.95%14.71%14.82%16.02%-7.02%20.83%9.59%24.70%-3.74%28.08%

Correlation

The correlation between CDC and DIA is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2014

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between CDC and DIA has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CDC vs. DIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CDC
DIA

Utilities

24.3%

-

Financial Services

24.1%
26.7%

Consumer Defensive

15.7%
3.9%

Energy

8.6%
1.9%

Healthcare

7.2%
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
10.3%

Technology

6.9%
16.1%

Communication Services

3.9%
5.2%

Industrials

2.3%
18.9%

Basic Materials

0.6%
3.9%

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Utilities

CDC
24.3%
DIA

-

Financial Services

CDC
24.1%
DIA
26.7%

Consumer Defensive

CDC
15.7%
DIA
3.9%

Energy

CDC
8.6%
DIA
1.9%

Healthcare

CDC
7.2%
DIA
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

CDC
7.0%
DIA
10.3%

Technology

CDC
6.9%
DIA
16.1%

Communication Services

CDC
3.9%
DIA
5.2%

Industrials

CDC
2.3%
DIA
18.9%

Basic Materials

CDC
0.6%
DIA
3.9%

Real Estate

CDC
0.0%
DIA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDC vs. DIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CDC
CDC Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDC Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDC Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

DIA
DIA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIA Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CDC vs. DIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDCDIADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.30

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.90

2.12

+1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.80

8.21

+5.59

CDC vs. DIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDC Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the DIA Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDC and DIA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDC vs. DIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDC drawdown since its inception was -21.37%, smaller than the maximum DIA drawdown of -51.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDC and DIA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDCDIADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.37%

-51.87%

+30.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.67%

-9.76%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.70%

-15.95%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.37%

-20.76%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.37%

-36.70%

+15.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.22%

-1.06%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-7.11%

+2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

2.52%

-0.92%

Volatility

CDC vs. DIA - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) at 3.74%. This indicates that CDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDCDIADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

3.74%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

9.82%

-2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.33%

12.52%

-2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.57%

14.83%

-2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.21%

17.53%

-4.32%

CDC vs. DIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDC has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than DIA's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDC vs. DIA - Dividend Comparison

CDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than DIA's 1.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDC
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
3.06%3.36%3.32%4.24%3.48%2.65%2.48%3.04%3.37%2.81%2.99%3.17%
DIA
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
1.37%1.43%1.61%1.81%1.91%1.58%1.87%1.85%2.24%1.97%2.26%2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDC and DIA have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDC has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to DIA (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDC dropped -21.37% vs DIA's -51.87%.

On 10-year performance, DIA leads with 13.26% vs 10.37% for CDC. On fees, DIA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, DIA has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DIA has performed better with a 13.26% return vs 10.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for CDC.

CDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 1.37% for DIA.

CDC is categorized as Low Volatility, while DIA is Large Cap Blend Equities. CDC tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index, while DIA tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for CDC and 0.16% for DIA.

CDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDC and DIA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer