PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDC vs. DIA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDC vs. DIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDC achieves a 12.82% return, which is significantly higher than DIA's 8.40% return. Over the past 10 years, CDC has underperformed DIA with an annualized return of 10.40%, while DIA has yielded a comparatively higher 13.70% annualized return.


CDC

1D
0.41%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
12.82%
6M
12.38%
1Y
20.49%
3Y*
12.60%
5Y*
6.42%
10Y*
10.40%

DIA

1D
0.30%
1M
2.44%
YTD
8.40%
6M
7.75%
1Y
24.46%
3Y*
17.24%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*
13.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDC vs. DIA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDC
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
12.82%8.96%14.48%-4.99%-7.86%33.05%12.88%19.64%-5.97%15.77%
DIA
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
8.40%14.71%14.82%16.02%-7.02%20.83%9.59%24.70%-3.74%28.08%

Correlation

The correlation between CDC and DIA is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2014

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between CDC and DIA has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CDC vs. DIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CDC
DIA

Financial Services

24.0%
27.3%

Utilities

23.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

15.1%
4.1%

Energy

8.8%
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
11.0%

Healthcare

6.9%
12.8%

Technology

5.0%
19.1%

Industrials

4.4%
18.1%

Communication Services

4.0%
1.8%

Basic Materials

0.0%
3.7%

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Financial Services

CDC
24.0%
DIA
27.3%

Utilities

CDC
23.9%
DIA

-

Consumer Defensive

CDC
15.1%
DIA
4.1%

Energy

CDC
8.8%
DIA
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

CDC
7.0%
DIA
11.0%

Healthcare

CDC
6.9%
DIA
12.8%

Technology

CDC
5.0%
DIA
19.1%

Industrials

CDC
4.4%
DIA
18.1%

Communication Services

CDC
4.0%
DIA
1.8%

Basic Materials

CDC
0.0%
DIA
3.7%

Real Estate

CDC
0.0%
DIA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDC vs. DIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDC
CDC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

DIA
DIA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIA Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
DIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDC vs. DIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDCDIADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

2.52

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.77

9.72

+3.05

CDC vs. DIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDC Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the DIA Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDC and DIA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDC vs. DIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDC drawdown since its inception was -21.37%, smaller than the maximum DIA drawdown of -51.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDC and DIA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDCDIADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.37%

-51.87%

+30.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.67%

-9.76%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.70%

-15.95%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.37%

-20.76%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.37%

-36.70%

+15.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-0.57%

-0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.09%

-7.13%

+2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

2.52%

-0.91%

Volatility

CDC vs. DIA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) is 3.34%, while State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that CDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDCDIADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

4.16%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.08%

9.76%

-2.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.96%

12.45%

-2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.52%

14.84%

-2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.23%

17.57%

-4.34%

CDC vs. DIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDC has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than DIA's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDC vs. DIA - Dividend Comparison

CDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than DIA's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDC
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
3.17%3.36%3.32%4.24%3.48%2.65%2.48%3.04%3.37%2.81%2.99%3.17%
DIA
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
1.39%1.43%1.61%1.81%1.91%1.58%1.87%1.85%2.24%1.97%2.26%2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDC and DIA have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIA has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to CDC (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDC dropped -21.37% vs DIA's -51.87%.

On 10-year performance, DIA leads with 13.70% vs 10.40% for CDC. On fees, DIA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, CDC has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DIA has performed better with a 13.70% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for CDC.

CDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 1.39% for DIA.

CDC is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DIA is Large Cap Blend Equities. CDC tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index, while DIA tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for CDC and 0.16% for DIA.

CDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDC and DIA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer