CDC vs. FNDB
Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB).
CDC and FNDB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CDC is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Jul 2, 2014. FNDB is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI US. It was launched on Aug 8, 2013. Both CDC and FNDB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CDC or FNDB.
Correlation
The correlation between CDC and FNDB is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CDC vs. FNDB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CDC:
1.87
FNDB:
2.00
CDC:
2.60
FNDB:
2.74
CDC:
1.33
FNDB:
1.36
CDC:
1.01
FNDB:
3.57
CDC:
7.98
FNDB:
10.20
CDC:
2.58%
FNDB:
2.26%
CDC:
11.01%
FNDB:
11.58%
CDC:
-21.37%
FNDB:
-38.17%
CDC:
-4.31%
FNDB:
-2.78%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CDC having a 2.63% return and FNDB slightly higher at 2.75%. Over the past 10 years, CDC has underperformed FNDB with an annualized return of 9.14%, while FNDB has yielded a comparatively higher 13.69% annualized return.
CDC
2.63%
2.85%
7.31%
20.24%
9.12%
9.14%
FNDB
2.75%
2.53%
6.83%
21.21%
14.83%
13.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CDC vs. FNDB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDC has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CDC vs. FNDB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CDC
FNDB
CDC vs. FNDB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CDC vs. FNDB - Dividend Comparison
CDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than FNDB's 3.30% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.18% | 3.32% | 4.24% | 3.48% | 2.66% | 2.49% | 3.04% | 3.37% | 2.81% | 2.99% | 3.17% | 1.20% |
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 3.30% | 3.39% | 3.70% | 3.11% | 4.12% | 6.45% | 3.28% | 4.91% | 4.83% | 2.06% | 4.41% | 4.12% |
Drawdowns
CDC vs. FNDB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDC drawdown since its inception was -21.37%, smaller than the maximum FNDB drawdown of -38.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDC and FNDB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CDC vs. FNDB - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) have volatilities of 4.18% and 4.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.