CCRV vs. TILL
CCRV (iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF) and TILL (Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both Commodities funds. CCRV is passively managed, while TILL is actively managed. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CCRV charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for TILL.
Performance
CCRV vs. TILL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CCRV
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TILL
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- 5.09%
- 6M
- 10.80%
- YTD
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- 8.07%
- 3Y*
- -4.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -6.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $839.16K | $645.70K | $1.54M |
CCRV vs. TILL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF | 0.00% | -0.05% | 5.74% | 5.47% | -9.69% |
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 10.14% | -5.97% | -13.98% | -5.00% | -11.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCRV and TILL is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2022 | 0.34 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CCRV and TILL has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCRV vs. TILL — Risk / Return Rank
CCRV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TILL
CCRV vs. TILL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCRV | TILL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.11 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.82 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.12 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCRV vs. TILL - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCRV | TILL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -33.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -26.09% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -21.64% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.81% | — |
Volatility
CCRV vs. TILL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCRV | TILL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 13.21% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 14.78% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 14.78% | — |
CCRV vs. TILL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCRV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TILL's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCRV vs. TILL - Dividend Comparison
CCRV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.43% | 7.26% | 33.27% | 26.22% |
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 4.51% | 4.97% | 2.55% | 51.24% | 0.73% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCRV and TILL have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CCRV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CCRV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for TILL.
TILL has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 0.00% for CCRV.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Teucrium. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CCRV and 0.89% for TILL.
Find the right allocation for CCRV and TILL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer