PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CCOR vs. QUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CCOR vs. QUS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) and QUS (SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. CCOR is actively managed, while QUS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CCOR returned -2.56%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for QUS. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CCOR charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.

Performance

CCOR vs. QUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCOR achieves a -3.71% return, which is significantly lower than QUS's 6.67% return.

CCOR

1D
0.30%
1M
-2.55%
YTD
-3.71%
6M
-4.87%
1Y
-5.97%
3Y*
-2.34%
5Y*
-2.56%
10Y*
—

QUS

1D
-0.43%
1M
2.68%
YTD
6.67%
6M
6.93%
1Y
17.65%
3Y*
17.53%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
13.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCOR vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF		-3.71%3.52%-5.70%-11.92%2.51%9.90%4.07%6.03%4.64%3.68%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF		6.67%14.13%18.99%21.78%-14.15%26.72%12.40%32.45%-3.66%13.06%

Correlation

The correlation between CCOR and QUS is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017

0.34

The correlation between CCOR and QUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (3 years) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CCOR vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CCOR
QUS

Financial Services

17.7%
14.6%

Technology

16.2%
26.3%

Healthcare

10.8%
13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
5.8%

Industrials

9.2%
8.6%

Communication Services

8.7%
10.2%

Energy

7.2%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
9.2%

Utilities

6.3%
3.6%

Basic Materials

5.1%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.8%
1.4%

Financial Services

CCOR
17.7%
QUS
14.6%

Technology

CCOR
16.2%
QUS
26.3%

Healthcare

CCOR
10.8%
QUS
13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

CCOR
9.4%
QUS
5.8%

Industrials

CCOR
9.2%
QUS
8.6%

Communication Services

CCOR
8.7%
QUS
10.2%

Energy

CCOR
7.2%
QUS
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

CCOR
6.8%
QUS
9.2%

Utilities

CCOR
6.3%
QUS
3.6%

Basic Materials

CCOR
5.1%
QUS
2.3%

Real Estate

CCOR
2.8%
QUS
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Core Alternative ETF

SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF

Often compared with CCOR:
CCOR vs. BTALCCOR vs. AIRRCCOR vs. QMNNXCCOR vs. BIMBXCCOR vs. JEPQCCOR vs. VOOCCOR vs. SPY
Often compared with QUS:
QUS vs. IVVQUS vs. QUALQUS vs. SPYQUS vs. JQUAQUS vs. VOOQUS vs. DGTQUS vs. BERZ

Return for Risk

CCOR vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CCOR
CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
QUS
QUS Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCOR vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CCORQUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.87
1.95

-2.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-1.15
2.81

-3.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.35

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.69

2.59

-3.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.59

11.54

-13.12

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CCOR vs. QUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCOR Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the QUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCOR and QUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CCORQUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.87

1.95

-2.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

0.78

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.83

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.77

-0.66

Drawdowns

CCOR vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.99%, smaller than the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOR and QUS.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CCORQUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.99%

-33.78%

+10.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-6.85%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.31%

-13.94%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.99%

-22.30%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-33.78%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.03%

-0.50%

-19.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.29%

-3.70%

-3.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

1.53%

+2.24%

Volatility

CCOR vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison

Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) have volatilities of 1.78% and 1.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CCORQUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

1.78%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.96%

6.66%

-1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.93%

9.09%

-2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.10%

14.33%

-3.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.75%

16.42%

-5.67%

CCOR vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCOR has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCOR vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison

CCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than QUS's 1.31% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF		1.11%1.07%1.18%1.21%1.11%1.02%1.50%0.73%1.53%0.89%0.00%0.00%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF		1.31%1.38%1.49%1.57%1.68%1.27%1.73%1.81%2.12%1.86%2.07%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

CCOR and QUS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QUS has higher volatility (1.78%) compared to CCOR (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCOR dropped -22.99% vs QUS's -33.78%.

On 5-year performance, QUS leads with 11.08% vs -2.56% for CCOR. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QUS has performed better with a 11.08% return vs -2.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.

QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 1.11% for CCOR.

They also come from different issuers: Core Alternative Capital and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for CCOR and 0.15% for QUS.

QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCOR and QUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer