CCOR vs. GQGU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU).

CCOR and GQGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CCOR is an actively managed fund by Core Alternative Capital. It was launched on May 24, 2017. GQGU is an actively managed fund by GQG Partners. It was launched on Jul 14, 2025.

Performance

CCOR vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CCOR vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	-0.34%	-2.28%
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	9.61%	-1.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCOR achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly lower than GQGU's 9.61% return.

CCOR

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -4.07%
• YTD: -0.34%
• 6M: 0.35%
• 1Y: -1.48%
• 3Y*: -3.32%
• 5Y*: -0.93%
• 10Y*: —

GQGU

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -1.96%
• YTD: 9.61%
• 6M: 7.66%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCOR vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCOR has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.

CCOR

Core Alternative ETF

GQGU

GQG US Equity ETF

Return for Risk

CCOR vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCOR

CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 9
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 8
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCOR vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CCOR	GQGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.14	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.14	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.35	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCOR	GQGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	1.25	-1.10

Correlation

The correlation between CCOR and GQGU is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CCOR vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison

CCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than GQGU's 0.93% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	1.07%	1.07%	1.18%	1.21%	1.11%	1.02%	1.50%	0.73%	1.53%	0.89%
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	0.93%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CCOR vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.99%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -6.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOR and GQGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCOR	GQGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.99%	-6.65%	-16.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.17%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.23%	-1.96%	-15.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.07%	-2.20%	-4.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.95%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CCOR	GQGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.17%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.44%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.74%	9.55%	+1.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.13%	9.55%	+1.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.81%	9.55%	+1.26%