CCOR vs. AVL
CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) and AVL (Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - CCOR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Core Alternative Capital, while AVL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CCOR returned -5.97% vs 167.73% for AVL. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. CCOR charges 1.09%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for AVL.
Performance
CCOR vs. AVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCOR achieves a -3.71% return, which is significantly lower than AVL's 72.10% return.
CCOR
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- YTD
- -3.71%
- 6M
- -4.87%
- 1Y
- -5.97%
- 3Y*
- -2.34%
- 5Y*
- -2.56%
- 10Y*
- —
AVL
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 29.70%
- YTD
- 72.10%
- 6M
- 38.64%
- 1Y
- 167.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCOR vs. AVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | -3.71% | 3.52% | -5.01% |
AVL Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares | 72.10% | 54.38% | 39.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCOR and AVL is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024 | -0.28 |
CCOR vs. AVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CCOR
AVL
Financial Services
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
CCOR
AVL
-
Technology
CCOR
AVL
Healthcare
CCOR
AVL
-
Consumer Cyclical
CCOR
AVL
-
Industrials
CCOR
AVL
-
Communication Services
CCOR
AVL
-
Energy
CCOR
AVL
-
Consumer Defensive
CCOR
AVL
-
Utilities
CCOR
AVL
-
Basic Materials
CCOR
AVL
-
Real Estate
CCOR
AVL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCOR vs. AVL — Risk / Return Rank
CCOR
AVL
CCOR vs. AVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) and Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares (AVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCOR | AVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.32 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 3.14 | -3.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | 7.02 | -8.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCOR | AVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.87 | 1.97 | -2.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 1.18 | -1.06 |
Drawdowns
CCOR vs. AVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.99%, smaller than the maximum AVL drawdown of -70.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOR and AVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCOR | AVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.99% | -70.63% | +47.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.75% | -53.69% | +44.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.03% | -0.97% | -19.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.29% | -23.38% | +16.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 24.00% | -20.23% |
Volatility
CCOR vs. AVL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) is 1.78%, while Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares (AVL) has a volatility of 23.46%. This indicates that CCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCOR | AVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.78% | 23.46% | -21.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.96% | 61.68% | -56.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.93% | 85.76% | -78.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.10% | 105.25% | -94.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.75% | 105.25% | -94.50% |
CCOR vs. AVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCOR has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than AVL's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCOR vs. AVL - Dividend Comparison
CCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than AVL's 17.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVL Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares | 17.16% | 29.04% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | 1.11% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.02% | 1.50% | 0.73% | 1.53% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCOR and AVL have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVL has higher volatility (23.46%) compared to CCOR (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCOR dropped -22.99% vs AVL's -70.63%.
On 1-year performance, AVL leads with 167.73% vs -5.97% for CCOR. On fees, AVL is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AVL has performed better with a 167.73% return vs -5.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVL is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.
AVL has the higher dividend yield at 17.16%, compared with 1.11% for CCOR.
CCOR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AVL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Core Alternative Capital and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for CCOR and 1.04% for AVL.
AVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCOR and AVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer