PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVL vs. BRKW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVL vs. BRKW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares (AVL) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVL achieves a 72.10% return, which is significantly higher than BRKW's -7.76% return.


AVL

1D
-0.97%
1M
29.70%
YTD
72.10%
6M
38.64%
1Y
167.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BRKW

1D
0.91%
1M
1.58%
YTD
-7.76%
6M
-8.63%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVL vs. BRKW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AVL
Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares
72.10%63.99%
BRKW
Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF
-7.76%2.09%

Correlation

The correlation between AVL and BRKW is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025

-0.18

AVL vs. BRKW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVL
BRKW

Technology

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

7.4%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

AVL
100.0%
BRKW

-

Basic Materials

AVL

-

BRKW

-

Communication Services

AVL

-

BRKW

-

Consumer Cyclical

AVL

-

BRKW

-

Consumer Defensive

AVL

-

BRKW

-

Energy

AVL

-

BRKW

-

Financial Services

AVL

-

BRKW
7.4%

Healthcare

AVL

-

BRKW

-

Industrials

AVL

-

BRKW

-

Real Estate

AVL

-

BRKW

-

Utilities

AVL

-

BRKW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVL vs. BRKW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVL
AVL Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVL Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
AVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

BRKW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVL vs. BRKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares (AVL) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVLBRKWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.02

AVL vs. BRKW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVLBRKWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

-0.36

+1.53

Drawdowns

AVL vs. BRKW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVL drawdown since its inception was -70.63%, which is greater than BRKW's maximum drawdown of -12.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVL and BRKW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVLBRKWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.63%

-12.64%

-57.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-10.70%

+9.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.38%

-5.34%

-18.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.00%

Volatility

AVL vs. BRKW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVLBRKWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

85.76%

17.23%

+68.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

105.25%

17.23%

+88.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

105.25%

17.23%

+88.02%

AVL vs. BRKW - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVL has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVL vs. BRKW - Dividend Comparison

AVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.16%, less than BRKW's 25.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AVL
Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares
17.16%29.04%0.22%
BRKW
Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF
25.19%14.45%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVL and BRKW have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BRKW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BRKW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for AVL.

BRKW has the higher dividend yield at 25.19%, compared with 17.16% for AVL.

AVL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BRKW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for AVL and 0.99% for BRKW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVL and BRKW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer